As organizations increasingly adopt automation, innovation practitioners are responsible for selecting, adapting, testing, and implementing externally sourced innovations. However, little is known about how these upstream practices shape worker-automation arrangements, limiting our ability to intervene in innovation practice to address automation adoption challenges. To disentangle this relationship, we interviewed nine innovation practitioners at a major European airport pursuing long-term autonomous operations and analyzed their practices through a co-performance lens. We synthesize five co-performance design principles and examine where current practices align or conflict. Our findings reveal tensions: innovation practitioners prioritize full-automation arrangements while postponing human considerations; contextual constraints shape solutions, but openness to reconfiguration remains limited; and co-learning rarely extends beyond pilot phases. These insights provide HCI research and practice with guidance for reframing the conceptualization of automation, particularly by encouraging earlier consideration of human roles, promoting iterative visions, and recognizing workers as co-designers throughout innovation pipelines.
Garoa Gomez-Beldarrain, Kars Alfrink, Euiyoung Kim et al.· 0 citations
AI-driven services continuously infer “models-of-users” to personalize content, automate decisions, and optimize interaction. Yet, most user models remain opaque, fragmented across platforms, and hard to correct, transfer, or revoke. As a result, personalisation in AI-driven services is commonly experienced as a trade-off between privacy and platform lock-in. Users must stay loyal to platforms if a model of adequate utility is to be built around them. This tension is sharpened by emerging regulatory obligations around transparency and user oversight (e.g., GDPR and the EU AI Act). We propose a full-day EICS 2026 workshop that focuses on engineering cross-compatible personalization: a vision for future interactive systems in which users can make their digital self-representations inspectable, editable, and selectively shareable. The workshop brings together researchers and practitioners from interactive systems engineering, HCI, AI/ML, and security/privacy to (1) map the design and engineering space of user-sovereign personalization; (2) derive reusable artifacts for the EICS community, such as a reference architecture, protocol sketches, and a pattern language of interaction techniques; and (3) seed a community around building interoperable toolchains for AI personalization that is not only accurate, but also controllable, auditable, and context-adaptive.