Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to predict which of two candidate answers a human evaluator would prefer, providing a scalable alternative when human evaluation is too costly. Unfortunately, LLM judgments can exhibit systematic biases. Prior work has documented position, verbosity or model...
Cesare Barbera, Luca Stradiotti, Lorenzo Cascioli et al.· 0 citations
In many high-stakes settings, human decision-makers can acquire support information before making a decision. However, acquiring information is costly, and disclosure may fail to improve human decisions or may even impair them. We tackle this problem by studying selective disclosure, i.e., the problem of learning when...
Carlotta Giacchetta, Alessando Bogani, Cesare Barbera et al.· 0 citations
Results show that CBMs, and particularly their interactive component, can improve human-AI team accuracy relative to both unaided human performance and performance with non-interpretable AI support, however, these benefits emerge only under certain conditions: classification tasks perceived as difficult, easily identif...
A. Bogani, Nicola Debole, E. Marconato et al.· 2 citations
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are interpretable-by-design neural networks that detect human-understandable concepts from the input and use them to generate predictions. By allowing users to inspect the concepts underlying a prediction and explore how predictions change under alternative concept configurations, CBMs...
A. Bogani, Nicola Debole, E. Marconato et al.· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that standard LtD strategies show class-dependent sampling bias in classification tasks in practice, and thus may disproportionately defer the minority classes when applied to imbalanced datasets, and that such asymmetries in task delegation may trigger human biases, ultimately leading to poorer down...
Dario Pesenti, A. Bogani, Stefano Teso et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.