The distinctive features of dynamic topologies, sparse contacts and evolving adversaries, necessitate that trust models for Vehicles Ad‐hoc Networks (VANETs) be adaptable. We introduced: a new trust‐based model for trust management in VANETs, which is a fully decentralized, modified Q‐Learning approach, and enables dynamic assessments of trust for vehicles (nodes). The system has three primary components: (1) a Q‐Learning Trust Calculation module which assesses trust in a vehicle based on previous interactions, (2) a Malicious Node Detection (MND) module which detects adversarial nodes through the use of adaptive thresholds, and (3) a Malicious Node Removal (MNR) module which removes adversarial nodes from the network through a process known as collaborative revocation. The combined contributions of these components is that the trust model increases overall network security and trust, and increases the reliability of the data in the network by providing a mechanism that is adaptable and resilient to the majority of attacks encountered in vehicular networks.
Anurag Gupta, Anil Kumar Sagar· Internet Technology Letters· 0 citations
Machine learning models, particularly deep learning architectures, achieve high performance in prediction tasks but remain susceptible to adversarial attacks. This study aims to enhance the robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), thereby improving the security of machine learning systems. A three-step approach is adopted. First, benign sample classification is performed using the MNIST benchmark dataset. Second, adversarial attacks, namely Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), DeepFool (DF), and the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), are launched on the trained models, resulting in significant performance degradation. Based on the biased outputs induced by adversarial perturbations, an adversarial detection model is subsequently established. Third, to counteract these attacks, various defense strategies, including adversarial training, defensive distillation, autoencoder-based denoising, ensemble methods, and feature squeezing are employed and evaluated using standard performance metrics and graphical analyses. The results indicate that, in the absence of defense mechanisms, PGD attacks lead to accuracy drops of approximately 27% in CNNs, 83% in DNNs, and 90% in RNNs, demonstrating severe model vulnerabilities. However, when defense strategies are applied, all models recover to an accuracy of at least 98.9%, with adversarial training improving performance under attack by up to 90%. Among the evaluated models, CNNs exhibit the highest baseline robustness, whereas DNNs and RNNs rely more heavily on defense mechanisms to maintain performance. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of secure and resilient machine learning systems capable of mitigating adversarial threats.
Surekha M., A. K. Sagar, Vineeta Khemchandani· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
