Skip to content

Author

Anshul Shah

We have 3 of 24 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Book Open access Jul 2026

Towards Improving CS Students' Generative AI Literacy

The widespread adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) tools by students across different educational levels highlights the need for them to develop robust GenAI literacy, including a working understanding of these systems' fundamental concepts, their limitations, and implications for responsible use. However, misconceptions about GenAI, such as perceiving these systems as mere search engines or database lookup systems, are commonly observed among students, while the availability of teaching resources remains fragmented, and learning objectives lack alignment. This Working Group aims to design pedagogical resources for computing science instructors, enabling them to develop students' GenAI literacy. To achieve this, the Working Group will first identify a concise set of GenAI literacy learning objectives informed by instructor experience, research literature, and community input, and subsequently design pedagogical resources aligned with these objectives.

Bruno Pereira Cipriano, O. Petrovska, Nuno Pombo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Mapping the Emerging Curriculum for AI-Assisted Software Engineering via Syllabus Analysis

As Generative AI coding tools reshape professional software development, universities have begun designing courses to prepare students for AI-assisted development workflows. By analyzing the syllabi of these courses, we can gather empirical evidence about these courses, reveal how this emerging curricular area is being defined, and gain guidance for future curriculum design. We analyzed 23 publicly available syllabi and course materials of upper-division, credit-bearing courses that meet specific criteria, including explicitly addressing Generative AI in software engineering. Through iterative qualitative coding, we characterized courses'learning objectives, assessments, topics, and documented AI tools. Our analysis reveals commonalities and differences among these courses that allow researchers and educators to study and develop future courses.

Francis Geng, Anshul Shah, Miannuan Chen et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Jul 2026

Using Peer Code Reviews to Scale a Brownfield Software Engineering Course

This experience report describes how peer code reviews were implemented in an upper-division software engineering course that focuses on making modifications to large, existing code bases (i.e., brownfield development).

Anshul Shah, Thomas Rexin, Andrew Smithwick et al. · 0 citations