Can LLM Agents Replace Reinforcement Learning Agents in Cyber Defence Automation: A Case Study Using the DARPA CAGE-2 Challenge
As cyber attacks grow more sophisticated, defenders need autonomous systems that are fast, adaptable, and explainable. Over the last decade, various strategies have been proposed for automated cyber defence (as opposed to static rule-based or signature-based), including those based on reinforcement learning (RL). Researchers have proposed various algorithms to improve RL-based defenders and evaluated them using simulation-based frameworks like the DARPA CAGE-2. Although RL showed promise, it has many limitations, for example, the lack of a realworld training environment and the need for extensive training, which is time-consuming. In this case study, we investigate whether LLM agents can be used instead of RL agents to automate cyber defence. Large Language Models (LLMs) can reason over natural language and generalize from extensive pretraining. They are attractive for cyber defence because they can read textbased system states and make human-like, explainable decisions. We propose a unique way to convert CAGE-2 states to natural language and a domain-specific fine-tuning method that improve the average reward and reduce hallucination significantly, beating existing RL-based agents and state-of-the-art LLM agents.