Skip to content

Author

Arimichi Takayama

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Comparison of elastic constants and surface energies of β-Sn from density functional theory, universal machine learning potential, and empirical potentials

The full elastic constant tensor and the surface energies of five low-index planes—(100), (101), (110), (111), and (001)—of β-Sn (tetragonal, I41/amd) are calculated using density functional theory (DFT) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional and a universal machine-learning interatomic potential (MLIP; Preferred Potential, PFP v8), which provides both PBE and regularized-restored strongly constrained and appropriately normed (r2SCAN) calculation modes, each with and without Grimme’s D3 dispersion correction. Results are compared with three modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potentials and experimental data. Both DFT and PFP resolve the long-standing order-of-magnitude C44 deficiency of MEAM potentials (1.5–7.9 GPa against the experimental 22.0 GPa), yielding C44 = 17.9–34.3 GPa. In contrast, C12 is systematically underestimated by all first-principles-based methods (15.2–41.5 GPa against 59.4 GPa) regardless of the choice of exchange–correlation functional, indicating a limitation of current functionals rather than an artifact of MLIP training. For surface energies, DFT/PBE predicts (100) to be the lowest-energy plane of β-Sn, and six of the seven non-DFT methods reproduce this. The equilibrium Wulff shapes of all methods except one MEAM potential retain a rounded polyhedral character qualitatively similar to that of DFT/PBE. Among the non-DFT methods, PFP/r2SCAN reproduces the DFT/PBE surface energies most closely. No single method simultaneously reproduces both the full elastic constant tensor and the surface-energy anisotropy of β-Sn, and the choice of computational method should be guided by the specific phenomenon of interest; among the methods tested, PFP/PBE + D3 offers the smallest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 25.1% for the elastic constants with respect to experiment, while PFP/r2SCAN gives the smallest MAPE of 5.0% for the surface energies with respect to DFT/PBE.

H. Tatsumi, Atsushi M. Ito, Arimichi Takayama et al. · 0 citations