Skip to content

Author

Ariz Naqvi

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Jul 2026

The governance paradox: how management quality drives and constrains sustainability-linked executive compensation

This study investigates how management quality shapes the adoption of sustainability compensation incentives (SCI) in European Union firms. It explores the dual role of governance in promoting sustainability-oriented executive pay in the short term while potentially constraining innovation as governance systems mature. Drawing on panel data from 952 EU-listed firms between 2010 and 2024, the study applies a dynamic random-effects Probit model with control-function and Mundlak corrections. This approach captures both immediate and persistent effects of management quality on SCI adoption while addressing endogeneity, temporal dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. Results reveal a strong positive short-term relationship between management quality and SCI adoption. Firms with robust governance systems are more capable of translating sustainability priorities into measurable executive incentives, enhancing accountability and legitimacy. However, this influence weakens and may reverse over time, suggesting potential governance saturation or institutional rigidity over time. Sectoral analysis shows stronger responsiveness in environmentally intensive industries, while cross-country comparisons reveal higher SCI adoption in nations with more mature ESG regulatory frameworks. The study advances corporate governance and sustainability compensation literature by theorizing a Governance Paradox, whereby the same governance capability that accelerates the initial adoption of sustainability-linked incentives subsequently attenuates their further development. Unlike prior work on organizational rigidity, institutional decoupling and diminishing returns, the Governance Paradox specifically captures how formalized management quality can translate into attenuated marginal expansion of SCI over time, even in high-ESG regulatory environments. Methodologically, it offers one of the few empirical applications of a dynamic Probit framework to executive sustainability incentives, providing new insights into how governance mechanisms evolve and shape long-term sustainability alignment.

Ariz Naqvi, Mujtaba M. Momin, Suzan Dsouza · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Green Innovation and Resource Use Efficiency in GCC Firms: The Role of Workforce Capability and Governance

This study examines whether environmental innovation strengthens resource use efficiency in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) firms and identifies the organisational conditions under which this relationship produces verifiable operational outcomes. Drawing on the natural resource‐based view, human capital theory and agency theory, this study develops a mediated–moderated framework in which workforce capabilities mediate the innovation‐to‐efficiency relationship while sustainability‐linked executive incentives and audit committee expertise act as governance‐level boundary conditions. Using an unbalanced panel of 1398 firm‐year observations from 281 listed GCC corporations over 2010 to 2024, retrieved from LSEG Datastream and the World Bank, this study employs a two‐step System‐GMM estimator to address endogeneity from lagged dependent variables and reverse causality, with instrument validity confirmed via Arellano–Bond AR(2) and Hansen tests. Environmental innovation enhances resource use efficiency both directly and indirectly through workforce capabilities. Sustainability‐linked incentives weaken the innovation‐to‐workforce pathway, and audit committee expertise dampens workforce contributions to efficiency, underscoring the need for governance structures that enable operational transformation.

Suzan Dsouza, Ariz Naqvi, Mujtaba M. Momin · 0 citations