Key Recovery from Residue-Confined Errors in Pradhan CRT-RLWE
We show that the CRT-FHE scheme of Pradhan et al.\ is insecure for laws within its assumed error distribution range. The secret key follows from the public key by a single ring inversion whenever the public multiplier is a unit. The plaintext is recovered from any ciphertext under such a law without the secret key, for every multiplier, giving chosen-plaintext advantage $1/2$. We further show that the transformation from ordinary Ring-LWE to CRT-RLWE does not preserve the error distribution, so it does not establish that CRT-RLWE is at least as hard as Ring-LWE. One mechanism underlies both. The Chinese remainder theorem (CRT) function is reduced modulo $p_1p_2$ while its output is used modulo a coprime modulus $q$, so under every zero-preserving section an error in $p_2\R$ encodes to zero. The law $p_2B_1$ is so confined, meets the stated conditions, and decrypts correctly. Confinement is not a weakness of scale: scaling any baseline law by $p_2$ leaves its ordinary Ring-LWE problem exactly equivalent, while the reduced encoder destroys every error it produces. The reduction discrepancy is a multiple of $p_1p_2$ and not of $q$, so the small-error premise of the proof cannot remove it, and at the reported parameters a single error coefficient refutes the identity while satisfying that premise. The centered binomial $B_2$ separates the coefficient laws at total variation distance $3/8$, and at the reported dimension that distance between the induced polynomial laws is exponentially close to one.