PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate expert radiologists' perceptions of the quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate for images that underwent controlled degradation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seven-levels of controlled degradations were applied to 10 single-slice image sets, with T2-weig...
Kang-Lung Lee, Jobie Budd, Shu-Huei Shen et al.· Diagnostic and Interventiona...· 0 citations
Metastatic prostate cancer is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. Under the selective pressure of androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapies, resistant phenotypes frequently emerge, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a clinically important p...
Zhi-Jun Chen, Erolcan Sayar, D. Guevara et al.· JCI Insight· 0 citations
In this article, we assess histologically validated quantitative parameters on 18F-piflufolastat (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and identify thresholds for differentiating malignant prostate cancer from benign tissue. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, men with prostate cancer...
L. Lindenberg, Erich P. Huang, G. Ulaner et al.· Journal of Nuclear Medicine· 0 citations
Although UQ has the potential to improve the safety and interpretability of AI-assisted screening, challenges remain, including calibration, threshold selection, computational cost, and the need for prospective clinical validation.
Fernando Vega Lara, Lisa Koopmans, Christian Roest et al.· Abdominal Radiology· 1 citation
Simple Summary Deciding between active surveillance and treatment for prostate cancer patients often requires accurate assessment of prostate tumors. Independent fast quantitative analysis may provide a check and support for radiologists who conventionally visually inspect MRI and may follow protocols such as PI-RADS....
Rulon Mayer, Yuan Yuan, J. Udupa et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
The findings highlight the need for evidence from large, multicenter, prospective trials and evaluation frameworks that reflect the consequences of clinical decision-making, as well as further exploration of safeguards to monitor and address mismatches between training data and incoming scans during deployment.
Lisa Koopmans, Fernando Vega Lara, Christian Roest et al.· Abdominal Radiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
