Trajectory planning strongly influences tracking accuracy, actuator demand, and overall execution behavior in robotic manipulators. Classical planners such as cubic, quintic, and trapezoidal profiles are widely used for their simplicity and smoothness, yet they remain purely kinematic and ignore system dynamics and control effort during trajectory generation. As a result, nominally smooth trajectories can lead to inefficient nonlinear execution and increased corrective control action. This paper presents a control-aware optimal trajectory planning framework that explicitly incorporates manipulator dynamics and actuator effort within a finite-horizon formulation. A midpoint linearization strategy is introduced to improve approximation accuracy for large point-to-point motions. In contrast to prior comparisons, the proposed approach enables fair, isolated evaluation of trajectory generation effects under identical closed-loop nonlinear execution conditions. To this end, a unified evaluation framework is developed in which all planners are executed under identical nonlinear dynamics, controller structure, and actuator constraints. Simulations on a nonlinear simplified UR5 manipulator show that the proposed approach consistently reduces tracking error, corrective torque, and closed-loop execution cost compared to classical methods, achieving substantial reductions in actuator effort and execution cost across all evaluated scenarios, demonstrating that kinematic smoothness alone does not ensure dynamically efficient execution.
Trajectory-tracking metrics such as root-mean-square error (RMSE), overshoot, and settling time are widely used to evaluate control performance in mechatronic systems. However, these measures describe output tracking alone and do not account for the actuator effort required to produce the observed motion. This limitation becomes more pronounced in nonlinear systems, where stiffness and dissipation depend on the system state. This paper examines how these effects influence actuator energy under similar tracking conditions. An energy-aware evaluation framework is introduced that combines tracking error with cumulative actuator energy and enables comparison between systems with approximately matched performance. A simple index (EAPI) is used to capture both aspects in a single measure. Simulation results for linear and nonlinear systems under proportional-derivative control show that comparable tracking accuracy can correspond to significantly different actuator energy. The nonlinear system consistently requires more energy across matched operating points, reflecting the influence of nonlinear stiffness and friction. These results suggest that trajectory-based metrics alone may not fully capture differences in system effort, and that including energy provides a more informative basis for performance evaluation.