In human-AI collaborative decision making, human review can prevent unsafe AI decisions, but each human judgment is costly. Treating human intervention after AI abstention as a one-off fallback misses the opportunity to improve future AI decisions for greater automation, yet AI adaptively learning from selectively quer...
Chenyu Zhang, Rachel Luo, Bo-Yi Li et al.· 0 citations
Self-improving policies continually expose new failure patterns, changing what their judges must be able to verify. However, current fixed judges constrain both optimization feedback and the discovery of useful training examples, limiting further self-improvement. This challenge is even more acute in embodied reasoning...
Ze-Wei Zhou, Rachel Luo, Yu-Long Cao et al.· 2 citations
Driving models increasingly ground reasoning in causal relations, spatial structure, perceptual evidence, and predicted futures. These advances make reasoning more faithful to the driving scene, but leave a fundamental question unresolved: what should groundedness mean when the model ultimately outputs an action? Corre...
Minkyoung Cho, Ze-Wei Zhou, Wen-Hao Ding et al.· 0 citations
A societal bias evaluation method for large vision-language models (LVLMs) in the era of strong safety guardrails is proposed, finding that all models undesirably use user demographic information in person-irrelevant tasks.
Yusuke Hirota, Michael Boone, Arun George Zachariah et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes COMPACT-VA, a planning-aligned working memory framework built on conditional VQ-VAE, compressing extended context into bounded representations, and evaluates on high-signal dynamic scenarios where historical context is most critical for behavior correctness, and accordingly design behavioral metrics.
Zhixuan Liang, Yuxiao Chen, Yurong You et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.