The extent to which LLMs can effectively perform human expert assessment of counterspeech quality across four dimensions is investigated, finding that LLMs show low agreement and moderate rank correlations with human experts.
Johnny Alali, Nicolás Benjamín Ocampo, Davide Ceolin
· 0 citations
Save
{ copied = true; setTimeout(() => copied = false, 1500) })"
class="icon-btn" aria-label="Copy link">
{ copied = 'apa'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy APA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'mla'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy MLA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'bibtex'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy BibTeX
Copied ✓
These insights show that LLMs have promising but moderate correlation with human judgment, with Llama-70B obtaining the strongest alignment and other LLMs exhibit weak, moderate, or high alignment while achieving comparable results against human judgment, suggesting partial but complementary understanding of underlying...
Nicolás Benjamín Ocampo, Agnes Paullate Nyiranziza, Davide Ceolin
· arXiv.org · 0 citations
Save
{ copied = true; setTimeout(() => copied = false, 1500) })"
class="icon-btn" aria-label="Copy link">
{ copied = 'apa'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy APA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'mla'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy MLA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'bibtex'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy BibTeX
Copied ✓
WSF-ARG+, the first dataset which combines hate speech with check-worthiness information is released, and a novel LLM-in-the-loop framework to facilitate the annotation of check-worthy claims is introduced.
Nicolás Benjamín Ocampo, Tommaso Caselli, Davide Ceolin
· arXiv.org · 1 citation
Save
{ copied = true; setTimeout(() => copied = false, 1500) })"
class="icon-btn" aria-label="Copy link">
{ copied = 'apa'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy APA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'mla'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy MLA
Copied ✓
{ copied = 'bibtex'; setTimeout(() => { copied = null; open = false }, 1000) })"
class="flex w-full items-center justify-between rounded-lg px-3 py-2 text-left text-sm hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-ink-800">
Copy BibTeX
Copied ✓