Skip to content

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Structured multi-level knowledge augmentation via small-to-large evidence-guided collaboration for knowledge-based VQA

Knowledge-based visual question answering requires models to connect question-relevant visual evidence with external knowledge for accurate reasoning. However, existing approaches still face two critical challenges: insufficient alignment between visual content and question intent, which leads to missing or irrelevant evidence, and ambiguity in entity-level semantics, especially for fine-grained or knowledge-intensive concepts. To address these issues, we propose an inference-time evidence augmentation framework for frozen-LLM-based KB-VQA. The framework uses lightweight vision–language models to construct structured textual evidence, which is subsequently provided to a frozen large language model (LLM) for final reasoning. We emphasize that the proposed method does not introduce a new LLM architecture or a new training mechanism; instead, it focuses on how question-relevant multimodal evidence can be systematically constructed, refined, and organized before LLM inference. The framework consists of four complementary evidence-construction modules: (1) a question-oriented image information extraction module that generates query-relevant visual descriptions to enhance visual–semantic alignment; (2) an entity enhancement module that introduces clarifying sub-questions to alleviate entity-level ambiguity; (3) a candidate-guided answer generation module that provides plausible answer cues to constrain the reasoning space; and (4) a contextual exemplar retrieval module that supplies relevant demonstrations to support knowledge-grounded inference. Experiments on OK-VQA and A-OKVQA show that the proposed method achieves 66.72% and 69.51% accuracy, respectively, outperforming strong baselines, while supplementary analyses examine its robustness, output-format reliability, and inference cost.

Meng Zhang, Dayu Wu, Wonjun Chung · 0 citations