Author

Douglas P. Beall

3 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Sep 2026

Preoperative versus Postoperative MRI Comparisons After the MILD Procedure vs. Open Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Multicenter Cohort Study.

The findings suggest that while MILD is tissue-sparing, it may be insufficient for achieving anatomical goals in patients with central LSS, and future percutaneous strategies should aim to combine the anatomical effectiveness of open decompression with the reduced tissue disruption characteristic of less exposure appro...

Mark Jones, L. Fandos, Jonathan S. Daitch et al. · The spine journal · 0 citations

Review Open access Sep 2026

Precision Orthobiologics for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Matching Biology, Pathology, and Patient Phenotype—A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions in Regenerative Pain Medicine

This narrative review examines current evidence through a conceptual “precision” framework organized around three axes and presents the three-axis framework as a testable hypothesis and a structure for stratified prospective trials, not as a validated clinical algorithm.

Giuliano Lo Bianco, Douglas P. Beall, Sudhir Diwan et al. · Medicina · 0 citations

Open access Aug 2026

Five-year outcomes from a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive interspinous fixation versus open direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Background Interspinous fixation devices (IFDs) provide indirect decompression and stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and are potentially less invasive than open decompression, but long-term comparative data are limited. Objective To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy, safety, and perioperative outcom...

G. Baranidharan, B. Bretherton, R. Feltbower et al. · Interventional Pain Medicine · 0 citations