Skip to content

5 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Oct 2026

Perceptions of nursing staffing needs for remote symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes before and after program implementation.

380 Background: Remote symptom monitoring using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) improves clinical outcomes and saves costs, but oncology clinicians and staff often worry that implementation will increase their workload and require new nursing staffing. We assessed how practices anticipated, experien...

N. Henderson, T. Padalkar, J. Jansen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

“More feet on the ground”: When non-clinical staff are needed for ePRO-enabled remote symptom monitoring implementation.

437 Background: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) improves clinical outcomes and saves costs, but successful implementation also depends on patient understanding, enrollment, and sustained engagement. Practices must determine who will introduce ePROs to patients,...

T. Padalkar, N. Henderson, Hope Sharp et al. · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence Nutrition Platform With Dietitians in Providing Nutrition Support to Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE Patients with cancer experience nutrition challenges, but access to registered dietitians (RDs) is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a specialized Artificial Intelligence (AI) Nutrition Platform trained on curated high-quality evidence is equivalent in providing nutrition information t...

M. Guirette, Marissa L. Buchan, E. Basch et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Process mapping of ePRO-enabled remote symptom monitoring across academic and community practices.

A practical framework for comparing RSM implementation across diverse oncology settings is provided and can guide role-specific training, support local adaptation, inform process measurement, and generate cross-site recommendations for implementing and sustaining ePRO-enabled RSM in routine cancer care.

N. Henderson, Sherrie D. Alexander, J. Jansen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

PRO‑CTCAE in Oncology Drug Evaluation: Cross-Agency Review of Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Decision-Making in the United States and Europe.

Harmonized, cross-agency guidance on PRO-CTCAE item selection, endpoint definition, analysis, and presentation may help support its consistent and meaningful use in future oncology submissions and regulatory and HTA decision-making.

E. Basch, Matthew Reaney, J. Roydhouse et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.