Associations of Emotional Eating with Perceived Stress and Sleep Quality Among University Students: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
Background/Objectives: Perceived stress and sleep quality are increasingly recognized as important determinants of emotional eating (EE), particularly among university students who are frequently exposed to academic pressures, psychosocial challenges, and lifestyle disruptions. Both stress and sleep quality are closely interconnected, with elevated stress contributing to sleep disturbances and poor sleep further exacerbating psychological distress. The present study aims to simultaneously examine the independent contributions of perceived stress and sleep quality to EE while accounting for other relevant sociodemographic, lifestyle, and anthropometric factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1297 university students recruited from 10 geographical regions of Greece. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, academic profile, lifestyle behaviors, and anthropometric parameters were collected using standardized and validated assessment instruments. Perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), while sleep quality was evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Emotional eating was assessed using the Emotional Eating subscale of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire–Revised 18 (TFEQ-R18), and participants were subsequently classified into tertiles corresponding to low, moderate, and high levels of emotional eating. Results: Perceived stress was independently associated with EE in the multivariable analysis. Compared with students reporting low levels of stress, those experiencing high perceived stress exhibited almost threefold greater odds of being classified in higher emotional eating categories (OR = 2.86; p = 0.0001). Likewise, participants with moderate perceived stress were approximately twice as likely to demonstrate elevated emotional eating levels relative to their low-stress counterparts (OR = 2.01; p = 0.0001). Sleep quality was also independently associated with EE after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Specifically, students characterized by inadequate sleep quality had more than three times the likelihood of belonging to higher emotional eating categories compared with those reporting satisfactory sleep quality (OR = 3.08; p = 0.0001). The multivariable model demonstrated good fit (Likelihood Ratio Test, p < 0.001), and the proportional odds assumption was satisfied (p = 0.46). Conclusions: These findings underscore the important role of psychological distress and sleep health in EE behavior, independent of other sociodemographic, academic, lifestyle, and anthropometric factors. Given the observed associations, interventions incorporating stress-management and sleep-improvement components may represent promising approaches for addressing emotional eating among university students; however, longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to establish causality. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to establish causality among perceived stress, sleep quality, and emotional eating.