Legionnaires disease is a severe respiratory illness caused by Legionella bacteria, with most cases occurring sporadically and environmental sources often unidentified. Effective outbreak detection requires understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of sporadic cases and their environmental drivers. We developed a mechanistically informed spatiotemporal model integrating fine-scale spatial heterogeneity, multi-week meteorological influences, and extended temporal lags. The framework combines a negative binomial generalised additive model (GAM), a Besag-York-Mollie (BYM2) spatial component, and distributed lag nonlinear models (DLNMs) to capture nonlinear, delayed effects of temperature, dewpoint depression, precipitation, and cloud cover. These outputs generate a national daily index of weather-driven vulnerability, which is combined with hierarchical clustering to identify potential outbreaks. Across 2000-2019, our model improved outbreak detection in 15 of 20 years compared with the baseline UKHSA approach; in the remaining years performance was either equivalent (two years) or only slightly worse (three years, 0.98% reduction). Mean relative improvements were 6.0%, with a maximum of 14.4% in 2013. Improvements were consistent across months, and coarser 0.25-degree grid evaluations likely underestimate the models advantage at finer spatial scales. The analysis also clarified dual-stage Legionnaires disease dynamics, distinguishing environmental bacterial growth from the shorter infection window, and demonstrated the necessity of extended lags for accurate risk prediction. This framework provides a robust platform for targeted surveillance and predictive modelling, supporting evidence-based interventions and enhancing preparedness for sporadic Legionnaires disease under observed climatic conditions.
N. Jamieson, C. Charalambous, D. Schultz et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Seasonal Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination programmes are critical for reducing morbidity and mortality in older adults, yet uptake remains uneven across populations. We aimed to profile vaccination attitudes and examine predictors of COVID-19/influenza vaccination uptake among a UK participatory surveillance system - FluSurvey. We analysed FluSurvey data from participants aged [≥]65 years who were eligible for both vaccines in the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 Autumn - Winter seasonal campaigns. Descriptive analyses examined self-reported attitudes to influenza vaccination. Logistic regression examined factors (age, sex, socioeconomic status, education, employment, transport, smoking and chronic conditions) associated with influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake in each season, adjusting for confounders. Belonging to a risk group and reducing risk of influenza were frequently reported motivations for influenza vaccination, while building natural immunity and concerns around safety and adverse effects were frequently reported barriers. Individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 were more likely to receive an influenza vaccination (aOR2023-2024=13.90 [9.28-21.17]; aOR2024-2025=8.54 [5.82-12.60]), and vice-versa (aOR2023-2024=13.91 [9.30-21.19]; aOR2024-2025=8.52 [5.81-12.58]). Lower educational attainment was associated with lower odds of COVID-19 vaccination (aOR2023-2024=0.59 [0.45-0.78], aOR2024-2025: 0.56 [0.39-0.79]). Other results were weaker or demonstrated variation by season. Our findings highlight recent attitudes and barriers to influenza and COVID-19 vaccination among the FluSurvey cohort, which may inform approaches to improve vaccination coverage in the population.
L. Adams, C. Watson, R. E. Green et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations