Skip to content

Author

H. Wahanani

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy for IMU-Based Sitting Posture Classification on Wearable Devices

Poor sitting posture is a significant contributor to musculoskeletal disorders in sedentary environments such as office work and remote learning. This study evaluates Interval Type-2 Fuzzy (IT2 Fuzzy) as a lightweight standalone classifier for IMU-based sitting posture classification on embedded wearable devices, comparing its performance against Support Vector Machine (SVM) under controlled experimental conditions. A dataset of 900 samples was collected using an MPU-6500 sensor with angle-simulation methods, representing three posture classes: upright, slightly slouched, and slouched. The dataset exhibits high inter-class separation (pitch angle differences approximately 10.8 degrees, 53 times the within-class standard deviations), enabling assessment of classifier behavior under well-defined conditions. Both IT2 Fuzzy and SVM achieved 100% classification accuracy on the test set, demonstrating feasibility for the controlled experimental scenario. Direct firmware deployment on an ESP32 microcontroller revealed comparable median inference times (IT2 Fuzzy: 29 microseconds, SVM: 26 microseconds), but IT2 Fuzzy exhibited 2.4 times lower timing variance (1.08 microseconds versus 2.61 microseconds) and superior timing predictability. IT2 Fuzzy requires only 6 parameters (48 bytes) compared to SVM's 141 parameters (192 bytes) and operates without training, normalization, or support vector storage. Additionally, IT2 Fuzzy provides native confidence scores and certainty indices without additional computation. These findings demonstrate that IT2 Fuzzy offers a viable alternative for embedded posture classification under controlled conditions, with advantages in model simplicity, timing consistency, and interpretability. Future work should validate performance on naturalistic multi-subject datasets with overlapping posture distributions and evaluate robustness to sensor drift and placement variability.

Zandy Qois, M. Idhom, H. Wahanani · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of OWASP WSTG and Top Ten in Web Security Audits

This study evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two widely adopted cybersecurity frameworks, the OWASP Top Ten (2021) and the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG), in the context of web application security auditing. While the OWASP Top Ten is a standard for risk awareness, it lacks the technical granularity required for comprehensive testing, creating a gap between high-level risk identification and practical verification. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a structured integration through comparative mapping and empirical validation using real-world mitigation data. A procedural analysis combined with granularity evaluation was employed to map the ten OWASP risk categories to 102 technical verification units in the WSTG. The results reveal a 920% increase in testing granularity compared to the baseline Top Ten framework. Empirical validation conducted on a government subdomain (Instansi X) demonstrated that this integrated approach identified critical vulnerabilities, including Broken Access Control and Cryptographic Failures, which are often overlooked in high-level assessments. By implementing specific WSTG-based mitigation procedures, such as middleware authorization and secure communication protocols, identified risks were successfully remediated without disrupting production stability. This study contributes a validated framework that bridges the gap between conceptual risk and actionable technical verification. The findings indicate that while the OWASP Top Ten serves as a strategic reference, the WSTG is superior as a primary technical auditing framework. This integration enhances audit consistency, precision, and efficiency in evaluating modern web environments.

Moch Wahyu Sampurno Utomo, H. Wahanani, Achmad Junaidi · 0 citations