Skip to content

Author

Hailan Zhou

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Aug 2026

An accessible digital single-molecule sensing platform for plasma P-tau217 quantification in Alzheimer's disease screening.

BACKGROUND Early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) necessitates affordable and accessible blood biomarkers. Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (P-tau217) is promising, but low-cost platforms for large-scale screening remain limited. METHODS We validated a Digital Single-Molecule Sensing (DiSMS) platform for plasma P-tau217 quantification. A reference interval was established in Cohort I (discovery, n = 325, comprising 143 cognitively unimpaired controls, 80 CE, 34 frontotemporal dementia [FTD], and 68 subcortical ischemic vascular dementia [SIVD] patients). Diagnostic performance was validated in Cohort II (n = 242; 77 CE, 165 controls). Cross-platform concordance was assessed against the Simoa HD-X in 137 paired samples. RESULTS The healthy reference interval was 0.09-0.51 pg/mL. In Cohort II, P-tau217 strongly distinguished AD from controls (accuracy 93.4% [95% CI: 90.3%-96.5%], sensitivity 92.2% [95% CI: 83.2%-96.8%], specificity 93.9% [95% CI: 88.8%-96.9%]). A two-cutoff approach (< 0.40, 0.40-0.50, > 0.50 pg/mL) yielded 94.1% accuracy and 95.9% sensitivity, leaving 8.4% of cases in the intermediate zone. DiSMS exhibited strong concordance with the Simoa (concordance rate = 94.9%; Spearman r = 0.94, P < 0.001). Plasma P-tau217 was significantly higher in AD than FTD (median 0.25 pg/mL) and SIVD (median 0.36 pg/mL) (both P < 0.001). Age-adjusted AUC was moderate for AD versus SIVD (0.777) but limited for AD versus FTD (0.665; sensitivity/specificity below 65%). CONCLUSIONS The DiSMS platform enables accurate, cost-accessible plasma P-tau217 quantification for AD screening, meeting consensus guidelines (≥90%). The limited P-tau217 performance for differentiating AD from FTD (AUC = 0.665) highlights the need for integration with complementary biomarkers or clinical assessments.

Meng Xue, Hongchao Pan, Yana He et al. · 0 citations