Skip to content

Author

Haiying Shen

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Conference Jul 2026

WaSMa: Workflow-Aware Scheduling for Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Public LLM services serve diverse multi-agent applications with varying workflow dependencies and performance requirements. Requests generated by these applications often exhibit commonality and interdependence, yet current systems largely ignore such application-level structure. As a result, at the LLM engine cluster level, assigning requests to engines with the shortest queue can cause inefficient KV-cache transfers across GPUs. Using three representative multi-agent applications, we show that current scheduling methods miss opportunities to (a) improve performance through KV-cache reuse and reduced data transfer, and (b) increase goodput via batch management informed by workflow dependencies. Motivated by these observations, we propose a Workflow-Aware Scheduling system for Multi-Agent LLM systems (WaSMa) that incorporates cluster-and engine-level scheduling to optimize LLM request execution across GPU resources. Experimental results show that WaSMa reduces the P95 tail latency by up to 48% and improves goodput by up to 107% compared to existing methods.

Uttam Rao, Ali Zafar Sadiq, Haiying Shen et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

FlowGuard: Slack-Aware Overload Control for Multi-Agent LLM Serving

Multi-agent applications increasingly rely on shared large language model backends in the public cloud, where bursty workloads cause requests from different agents to contend for the same LLM instances, leading to long queues, memory imbalance, and severe tail-latency inflation. Existing approaches typically prioritize requests using coarse workflow positions or static execution heuristics, which fail to adapt to short-term overload dynamics. We present FlowGuard, a workflow-aware overload controller for multi-agent LLM serving. Its key insight is that under sustained overload, GPU cycles spent on requests whose execution service-level-objectives (SLOs) are already violated are wasted. FlowGuard continuously recomputes per-request slack and prioritizes requests with the greatest remaining time before their deadlines, thereby maximizing on-time completions. In addition, a resource-aware dispatcher jointly accounts for KV-cache memory pressure and in-flight queue depth to reduce preemption across shared instances. Evaluated on a deliberately over-subscribed two-GPU backend, where all policies exhibit high absolute miss rates (i.e., the percentage of workflows that miss their deadlines), FlowGuard reduces the miss rate by 14–28% points over workflow-oblivious and static-priority baselines under BurstGPT-driven load, and by 34–38% points under co-located mixed-agent workloads.

Ali Zafar Sadiq, Haiying Shen · 0 citations