Skip to content

Author

Ilias E. Panagiotopoulos

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Ranking Inversion in Risk-Parameterised UAV Path Planning for Wildfire Emergency Response

Wildfires generate rapidly evolving hazard landscapes that disrupt ground-based logistics and render conventional disaster-response operations ineffective, motivating the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in civil-protection missions such as medical resupply, casualty search-and-rescue, and perimeter surveillance. Existing evaluations, however, share a common limitation: they assess performance using navigation-centric metrics—primarily success rate—without accounting for the temporal value of the mission objective. This paper characterises, within each planner family, how a single risk coefficient ρ governs the trade-off between navigation success and time-decaying mission value: holding each family’s algorithm and replan trigger fixed and sweeping only ρ isolates its effect, so that the risk setting maximising a family’s navigation success need not maximise its mission value. To study this, FLARE is introduced, a deterministic benchmark for fire-landscape adaptive risk evaluation, inspired by recent Greek wildfire events; all hazard dynamics (fire spread, structural collapse, moving obstacles, dynamic no-fly zones) are modelled as benchmark abstractions rather than incident-specific reconstructions. FLARE evaluates eight planners spanning six risk-handling paradigm families, isolating the risk coefficient by sweeping ρ within each family (algorithm fixed) with A* as the risk-blind static reference, and quantifies mission impact—medication efficacy, casualty survival, and data freshness—through a strictly time-decreasing mission-score function. The mission-value leverage of ρ is strongly family-dependent: decisive for the incremental soft-cost-inflation family—whose success-optimal ρ collapses its mission value (0.91 → 0.41)—strong for the worst-case (CVaR) family, moderate for the sampling family, and negligible for the reactive, hard-threshold and frequent-replan families. In some families the success-optimal and mission-optimal ρ diverge—a within-family ranking inversion—while in others they coincide; because the algorithm is fixed across each sweep, the divergence is attributable to ρ alone. Success of navigation is therefore a necessary but insufficient proxy for mission effectiveness, and the risk coefficient is a meaningful per-family parameter for mission-aware configuration.

Konstantinos Zervakis, Ilias E. Panagiotopoulos · 0 citations