Skip to content

Author

İnci Zaim Gökbay

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access 2026

Semantic Isotopies of Retribution in Pre-Attack Manifestos: An AI-Assisted Conceptual Metaphor Analysis of Moral Justification

Pre-attack written communications encode ideological structure, yet existing computational analyses rely on prior-loaded feature spaces—hand-curated Lakoff inventories or LIWC-style counters—that confirm what the literature already expects rather than discovering what is in the data. We present a neuro-symbolic architecture for unsupervised conceptual-metaphor discovery that satisfies the auxiliary-information conditions under which the Locatello et al. non-identifiability result no longer applies. The contribution is a single, end-to-end-trainable model that operationalizes the inductive biases of four identifiability results: iVAE conditional priors, $\beta $ -Total-Correlation factorization, Slow-VAE time-contrastive identifiability, and the Graph Information Bottleneck. These are realized over a multi-relational graph—co-occurrence, syntactic-dependency, similarity, and semic-prior edges—encoded by a Multi-Head GATv2 and disentangled by an iVAE. As a methodological test bed—not an evaluation benchmark—we apply it to a perpetrator-only forensic corpus (598 sentence-windowed segments, 29 documents, 24 lone-actor authors, 1966–2024) and provide a deterministic, fully reproducible implementation of the full pipeline. Without any predefined lexicon, the model recovers a “retribution-as-debt” axis (top tokens retribution, sex, justice, degenerate) that a rule-based Lakoff lookup would miss; author-conditioning controls (perpetrator identity masked and shuffled) indicate this axis encodes content rather than author-specific vocabulary. Against matched-protocol baselines it attains the best cross-perpetrator macro-F1 (0.44 vs. 0.31 for the strongest baseline). We explicitly disclaim threat-screening applicability: with perpetrator-only data and no control group, sensitivity and specificity are not estimable; the contribution is to the mathematics of identifiable disentanglement, not to operational threat assessment.

Alaskar Ozpercin, İnci Zaim Gökbay · 0 citations