Skip to content

Author

J. Capdevila Pujol

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

The development and validation of a digital food-frequency questionnaire to assess habitual diet: The PREDICT Food Frequency Questionnaire

Abstract In the context of the rapidly evolving modern food environment, there is a need for dietary assessment tools to accurately assess current food intake. The objective of this research was to develop and validate a new food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). A 265 item web-based, self-administered FFQ (PREDICT-FFQ-v1) was developed using information from two FFQs and US and UK cohort level data. Over a 1-month period, 68 participants completed the PREDICT-FFQ-v1 and six 24-h recalls (reference tool; Intake24). Relative validity was assessed using Bland–Altman plots, cross-classification food group analysis, and Spearman’s rank correlation for food groups and nutrients. From the Bland–Altman plots, the median bias between the PREDICT-FFQ-v1 and Intake24 were energy (414 kcal (95%CI 289 to 609) (1734 kj (95% CI 1208 to 2549)), carbohydrate (2.3 %EI, 95%CI 0.08 to 3.68), fat (2.5 %EI, 95%CI 0.23 to 3.52), protein (−1.14 %EI, 95% CI −1.64 to −0.23), and fibre (1.86 g/1000 kcal, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.65). Cross-classification by quartiles of diet quality (plant-based diet index) categorised >76% of participants into the same or adjacent quartiles. Correlation coefficients for food groups assessed using both tools ranged from 0.38 (legumes) to 0.78 (meat), and for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 0.28 (total fat) to 0.82 (alcohol). The PREDICT-FFQ-v1 captures intakes of foods that are commonly consumed in modern diets, with greater resolution at the food level than previous tools. The PREDICT-FFQ-v1 has acceptable relative validity in comparison to 24-h dietary recall and provides a valuable alternative for assessing dietary intake in nutritional epidemiology.

K. Bermingham, I. Linenberg, L. Francis et al. · 0 citations