Skip to content

Author

J. Eichstaedt

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

A Framework for Evidence-Based Psychotherapy with AI (EBP-AI)

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and large language models (LLMs) offer substantial potential to augment or even fundamentally change elements of psychological assessment and treatment. However, current AI technologies have yet to demonstrate the capacity to effect meaningful and sustained clinical change. This gap reflects both the limited integration of clinical science knowledge into language models and applications built using them, as well as the mismatch between the brief, minutes-long nature of most AI interactions and the months-long course of most evidence-based treatments. Here we introduce the Evidence-Based Psychotherapy with AI (EBP-AI) framework, which articulates a set of principles for developing effective clinical AI applications: a) psychodiagnostic assessment, b) longitudinal case conceptualization, c) appropriately dosed intervention planning, d) meaningful progress evaluation, e) rigorous validation with clinical populations, f) attention to real world implementation and use, g) clinically appropriate style, and h) understanding clinical psychology as a living science. We introduce a set of key technical questions for the development and evaluation of clinical LLMs and AIs aligned with these principles. Despite their potential, current clinical AIs fall short, in part due to issues with memory, sycophancy, and prioritizing short-term helpfulness over long-term clinical impact. Responsible and ethical design of effective, clinical-science-based AI systems will require understanding their limitations and strategically extending their capabilities.

Elizabeth C. Stade, Philip Held, H. A. Schwartz et al. · 2 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Real-world use of large language models for mental health in 2024

The extent to which people use general-purpose large language models (LLMs) for their mental health is unknown. Information about use patterns is important for clinicians, developers, and regulators. We surveyed U.S. adults (n = 1871) between August and October 2024 using stratified sampling across age, sex, and race/ethnicity to approximate national demographics. We found that 24% of participants use LLMs for mental health; they are disproportionately young, male, and Black, and have poor mental health. Participants reported difficulty accessing traditional treatment and using LLMs because they are free, convenient, and available. They report using LLMs for emotional support, learning therapy skills, and supplementing existing therapy. Using Pew-reported estimates of population LLM use, we conservatively estimate that as of 2024, 14–18 million U.S. adults may have been using LLMs for mental health. This work highlights the need for monitoring and evaluation to understand the potential harms and benefits of such use.

Elizabeth C. Stade, Zoe M. Tait, Samuel T. Campione et al. · 2 citations