Skip to content

Author

Jonathan Friedman

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic efficacy of deep learning-based denoising of low-field 0.55 T compared to conventional 3 T knee MRI.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-field 0.55 T knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without deep learning (DL)-based image denoising techniques compared to conventional 3 T MRI. METHODS This retrospective study included 33 knee MRIs from 26 patients (10 women, mean age 52 years; ±16.9 years) with knee pain (mean duration 2.7 years; ±4.8 years) who underwent both 0.55 T and 3 T MRI. DL-based denoising (ImT-MRD) was applied to all 0.55 T datasets. Four radiologists assessed image quality, anatomical landmark visibility (4-point Likert scale), and diagnostic confidence for pathology detection (10-point scale). Diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, was calculated using consensus reading as standard of reference. Agreement was performed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). RESULTS 0.55 T without DL showed a moderate sensitivity of 0.83, a specificity of 0.82, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. For 3 T, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 0.95, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. 0.55 T with DL improved sensitivity to 0.97 and diagnostic accuracy to 0.98. Agreement with 3 T was excellent for 0.55 T with DL (CCC: 0.94) and substantial for 0.55 T without DL (CCC: 0.78). Image quality was significantly higher for 0.55 T with DL compared to 0.55 T without DL (2.92vs.2.55;p = 0.005), yet 3 T outperformed both (3.44;p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher for 0.55 T with DL compared to 0.55 T without DL (8.21vs.7.66;p < 0.001), with 3 T demonstrating the highest confidence levels overall (8.60; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION DL-based denoising of 0.55 T knee MRI significantly enhances the diagnostic performance, demonstrating results comparable to conventional 3 T, which were not achieved with 0.55 T MRI alone.

S. Ulas, Madeline Hess, Zheren Zhu et al. · 0 citations