Skip to content

Author

J. Geisler

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Aug 2026

Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the cardio-oncology registry (CARE) study: a prospective, observational study of cardiotoxic effects during breast cancer therapy

Anthracycline and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapy may induce cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Current guidelines recommend risk stratification using the Heart Failure Association–International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) risk assessment tool. However, data on the incidence of CTRCD in contemporary breast cancer populations treated according to current standard-of-care regimens remain limited. Moreover, the actual cardiovascular risk associated with the HFA-ICOS risk categories in breast cancer treatment remains uncertain. Real-world evaluation of whether this consensus-based stratification appropriately separates patients according to subsequent CTRCD risk has been highlighted as a key research priority. Overall, the study aims to determine the incidence of CTRCD and to evaluate cardiovascular risk stratification using the HFA-ICOS tool and its association with subsequent CTRCD. CARE is a prospective observational study including women scheduled for (neo)adjuvant anthracycline therapy and/or HER2-targeted therapy. Echocardiography, using standard and novel echocardiographic parameters, and circulating cardiac biomarkers were assessed at baseline (visit 1), after completion of scheduled therapy (visit 2), and 12 months after completion of scheduled therapy (visit 3). Participants were categorized into three treatment regimen groups: 1) Anthracycline therapy only, 2) HER2-targeted therapy only, and 3) HER2-targeted therapy sequentially to anthracyclines (Figure 1). The primary outcome is incidence of CTRCD. Secondary outcomes include HFA-ICOS risk stratification in relation to subsequent CTRCD. In total, 515 women (median age (Q1,Q3): 53 (45,64) years) were included. Overall, 335 (63%) participants received anthracycline therapy only, 100 (15%) received HER2-targeted therapy only, and 80 (19%) received anthracycline therapy followed by HER2-targeted therapy. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors included hypertension in 20%, current smoking in 13%, diabetes in 7%, and a history of heart disease in 7.6%, while 3.5% had received previous anti-cancer treatment (Table 1). The CARE study is a large prospective observational cardio-oncology study evaluating the incidence of CTRCD after contemporary breast cancer therapy regimens. With systematic echocardiographic and biomarker assessment, the study will provide important insights into the incidence of CTRCD, the performance of the HFA-ICOS risk stratification tool and follow-up strategies in routine cardio-oncology care.Table 1Baseline Characteristics CARE  Figure 1Consort Diagram

V. Vinje, E. Orstad, G. Gulati et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Baseline and early changes in cardiac biomarkers as predictors of global longitudinal strain deterioration during breast cancer therapy: a PRADAII substudy

Cardiac biomarkers are recommended for risk stratification before and during potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapy, but the prognostic value of baseline levels and early changes for subsequent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction remains unclear. To evaluate wheter baseline and early changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predict changes in global longitudinal strain (GLS) over 18 months. In the randomized PRADAII, 138 women treated with anthracyclines (±trastuzumab) received sacubitril/valsartan or placebo and underwent serial biomarker sampling and cardiac imaging at baseline, post-anthracycline, and 18 months. Longitudinal changes in GLS and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were analyzed using adjusted linear mixed models, including exploratory analyses of combined, persistent, and peak biomarker elevations. Mean age was 54.0±9.4 years. At baseline, no patients had hs-cTnI values above the sex-specific 99th percentile, 6 (4%) had hs-cTnT >99th percentile, and 16 (12%) had NT-proBNP >125 ng/L. Mean baseline GLS was −19.5±2.1% and CMR- and echocardiography-derived LVEF was 60.3±4.8% and 58.3±6.2%, respectively. GLS declined modestly over follow-up, with less deterioration in the sacubitril/valsartan group than in the placebo group (ΔΔ −1.26, 95% CI −2.19 to −0.33). Both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT increased markedly after anthracycline therapy, with 16.7% and 71.7% exceeding the sex-specific 99th percentile at peak, whereas NT-proBNP showed modest changes with wide inter-individual variability. Transient and persistent troponin elevation occurred in 60.1% and 11.6%, respectively; corresponding NT-proBNP elevations in 5.1% and 7.3%, and combined troponin and NT-proBNP elevation in 9.4%. Baseline biomarker levels were not associated with GLS deterioration, and no biomarker–treatment interactions were observed (all p for interaction >0.27). Early post-anthracycline changes in hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT, or NT-proBNP were not predictive of subsequent GLS decline, nor were peak or persistent elevations (Table 1, Figure 1). No significant associations were observed between baseline or early biomarker levels and changes in LVEF assessed by echocardiography or CMR. In our breast cancer cohort with preserved baseline LV function, baseline levels and early changes in hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT, and NT-proBNP were not associated with subsequent deterioration in GLS over 18 months. Larger studies including higher-risk patients and clinical endpoints are needed to clarify the role of cardiac biomarkers in individualized cardiotoxicity risk stratification.  

M. Gynnild, G. Gulati, A. Mecinaj-Lilleaasen et al. · 0 citations