Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

DFGP: Computational framework for makespan-aware multi-robot task allocation in obstacle-rich environments

Static multi-robot task allocation in obstacle-rich environments becomes more challenging as the problem size increases because trivial and contested assignments are typically addressed during the same planning process. This paper presents the computational depot-frontier growth partitioning (DFGP) framework for organising assignment decisions in static depot-aware multi-robot task allocation. In a centralised, full-information setting, DFGP expands depot-centred frontiers so that tasks exposed to a single frontier are absorbed in parallel, whereas only boundary tasks shared by multiple frontiers are resolved through entropy-based priority. Residual budget constraints limit frontier expansion, and the planning process is completed using dead-end recovery and bottleneck-oriented refinement. A benchmark evaluation across 18 scenarios encompassing six maps and robot counts of 5, 10, and 20 demonstrates that DFGP achieved an average lower-bound gap of 8.5%, compared with 20.4% for the strongest LKH-Minmax baseline, and attained the theoretical lower bound in six scenarios. In addition, DFGP also exhibits fixed-seed reproducibility with σ = 0, an allocation runtime of 1.3–2.5 s, and consistent lower-bound proximity across four maps in the 20-robot setting. Active construction indicators reveal that most assignments are absorbed uncontested, with frontier-based contested resolution and rescue confined to boundary cases; this resolution is most decisive in the intermediate-load regime, where task–robot competition is highest, whereas the headline gap reflects the combined effect of all framework stages. These results position DFGP as a benchmarked computational framework for obstacle-aware multi-robot planning that combines a low lower-bound gap with deterministic and practical execution.

J. Seo, Joonwook Lee · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Optimization-Based and Optimization-Linked Decision Methods for Building Construction Safety: A Systematic Review

Building construction sites are dynamic systems in which safety decisions interact with time, cost, productivity, equipment movement, and spatial constraints. This systematic review examines how building-construction-stage safety is represented in optimization-based and optimization-linked decision studies published between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2026. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020-informed workflow used searches of the Web of Science Core Collection and IEEE Xplore, supplemented by Google Scholar and backward-citation checks. Seventy-nine studies met the core inclusion criterion, which required safety to appear as a quantified objective, constraint, evaluation metric, decision criterion, or prediction target. Studies were classified by problem type, safety role, method family, digital integration, and validation evidence. The synthesis identifies a problem-type-dependent formulation pattern: site-layout and scheduling studies mainly optimize safety or exposure objectives; crane/lifting studies distribute safety across constraints, objectives, and decision criteria; risk-decision studies use criteria or metrics; and prediction studies tune models whose targets are safety or risk outcomes. The core corpus is concentrated in site-layout and crane/lifting studies, whereas temporary works, monitoring-to-intervention, and construction-stage emergency response are less often formulated as optimization problems. Strict real-site/field evidence was identified in 7 of 79 studies, with an upper sensitivity bound of 11. Future research should prioritize transparent metrics, benchmarks, field validation, and closed-loop workflows.

J. Seo, JinHwan Kim, Gyeonggyu Park et al. · 0 citations