COVID-19 has placed a monumental burden on the health care system globally. Although no longer a public health emergency, there is still a pressing need for effective treatments that prevent adverse outcomes associated with this disease. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-R) is a promising and potentially effective antiviral, which until recently was under emergency use authorization. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of NMV-R in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, death and long-COVID in a large nationwide cohort of outpatients with COVID-19.
Population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test or diagnosis (index) date between December 2021 and February 2023 within the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), with at least one risk factor for severe COVID-19, no evidence of contraindicated medical conditions or medication use, and no hospital or emergency department visit or death within 24 hours of eligibility. We emulated a sequence of target trials beginning on each of the first five days of diagnosis with COVID-19. We identified 921,034 eligible person-trials (each representing a patient’s eligibility at a given diagnosis day across sequential emulated trials), of which 77,449 were initiators and 846,585 were non-initiators of NMV-R treatment. NMV-R Initiators were matched to non-initiators in each trial. The marginal hazard ratio between initiators and non-initiators was estimated for four acute outcomes: severe illness, hospitalization or death, hospitalization, and death; and the post-COVID condition or long COVID.
Of 921,034 eligible “person-trials”, 74,449 were initiators and 846,585 were non-initiators of NMV-R treatment. Pooled across trials, the hazard for severe illness (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.81), hospitalization or death (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.57), hospitalization (sdHR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.60), death (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.51), and long-COVID (sdHR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95) were significantly lower among NMV-R initiators compared to non-initiators. Results further indicated larger associations between NMV-R and reduced risk of both acute and post-acute outcomes with early versus delayed NMV-R treatment initiation, and among unvaccinated versus vaccinated patient subgroups.
NMV-R is overall effective at preventing the risk of severe acute outcomes including hospitalization and death, as well as long COVID. Results were robust across multiple sensitivity considerations.
Not applicable.
Steve R Makkar, Kristen Hansen, Arjun S. Yadaw et al.· BMC Infectious Diseases· 0 citations
Summary Background Vaccination is a vital tool in preventing acute COVID-19 and may confer additional protection against Long COVID, although it is unclear whether this protection wanes over time. Methods We assessed electronic health record (EHR) data from a national, retrospective cohort of patients, comparing the 12-month cumulative incidence of Long COVID (ICD-10 code U09.9) among (A) patients who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated (two or more versus zero doses) and (B) patients diagnosed with acute COVID-19 1–3 months, 3–5 months, or 5–7 months after vaccination. Findings In our binary cohort (n = 519,980), we found that patients who were vaccinated had a lower risk of Long COVID (adjusted risk ratio 0.84 (0.81, 0.88)) or mortality (adjusted risk ratio 0.83 (0.81, 0.86)) than patients who were unvaccinated. In our longitudinal cohort (n = 1,085,291), we did not find significant heterogeneity in Long COVID risk during the seven months following vaccination. Interpretation We found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against Long COVID, and we did not observe a significant waning of this protection within seven months after vaccination. Funding This research was financially supported by the 10.13039/100000060National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1K01AI182501 to Zachary Butzin-Dozier) and a Global Development grant (OPP1165144) from the 10.13039/100000865Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the 10.13039/100005595University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Individual authors were supported by the following funding sources: 10.13039/100000025NIMHR01131542 (PI Rena C. Patel), Jerrod Anzalone is supported by the 10.13039/100000057National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U54 GM115458, which funds the Great Plains IDeA-CTR Network. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Z. Butzin-Dozier, Yunwen Ji, Lin-Chiun Wang et al.· EBioMedicine· 0 citations