Rapidly expanding use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education creates both opportunities and challenges for learning assessment. While GenAI can provide adaptive feedback and personalization, its pedagogical integration remains underdeveloped and often disconnected from established theories of learning and participatory design processes. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an integrative conceptual model of Hybrid Intelligent Assessment Systems (HIAS), which combines AI capabilities with human oversight to enable transparent, ethical, and pedagogically aligned assessment. HIAS is structured through three interdependent layers of adoption: a pedagogical layer, aligning AI-supported assessment with self-regulated learning and the development of knowledge, skills, and attitudes; a governance layer, ensuring transparency, fairness, and human-in-the-loop validation; and a technological layer, enabling scalable integration within digital learning environments. The study is situated in Estonia, a digitally advanced context with system-level AI integration through the national AI Leap initiative. To complement the conceptual model, an empirical study was conducted across three major Estonian universities, involving 66 professors and researchers and 153 students. In addition, a small-scale pilot implementation was conducted in a design thinking course to explore the practical feasibility of a course-specific HIAS-based AI assistant. The findings reveal a consistent pattern: while both groups demonstrate a broadly positive orientation toward AI, students approach AI primarily as an efficiency-driven learning tool, whereas academic staff emphasize pedagogical control, ethical considerations, and responsible use. Across both groups, AI literacy remains uneven, particularly in critical evaluation and structured application. These findings expose a critical gap between rapid AI adoption and insufficient pedagogical integration. In response, HIAS is proposed as a structured, human-centered framework that supports teachers in designing AI-enhanced learning environments and students in developing critical, self-regulated, and responsible use of AI.
S. Rakić, Janika Leoste, Einar Kivisalu et al.· Education sciences· 0 citations
Generative AI is increasingly used for feedback in higher education, but evidence from repeated classroom use remains limited. This short paper analyses 2988 reflective essay-feedback-appraisal instances from 283 Estonian bachelor students across one semester. Students obtained and assessed feedback from a self-selected AI tool using a uniform prompt. The present analysis of the anonymized text corpus covers essay content, AI feedback, and its perceived helpfulness. Students found feedback helpful and actionable more often than not; about a tenth thought AI unhelpful, more so towards the end of the semester. We also analyzed essay reflection depth, and used a validated AI text classifier to estimate the share of essays that could be treated as likely unaided student writing. The study contributes descriptive classroom evidence on integration of AI feedback - a fast and scalable way to provide immediate writing advice, but not a self-contained route to better reflection. Benefits depend on whether students learn to use AI selectively and critically, without sliding into over-use harmful for the learning process.
Andres Karjus, Janika Leoste, Tiia Õun· 0 citations