Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Book Open access Jul 2026

Beyond the Single Path: Divergent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential in recommendations due to their powerful reasoning capabilities. However, existing methods typically rely on a single reasoning path to drive the entire Top-K recommendations. This paradigm is prone to reasoning path collapse, where limiting exploration of potentially superior and diverse reasoning paths within the LLMs space. As a result, both the accuracy and diversity of the recommendation outcomes are constrained. To address this issue, we propose a novel model, Divergent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation, named DivReason. Inspired by the structure of intellect theory, which emphasizes a two-stage cognitive process of divergent thinking followed by convergent thinking, DivReason is designed with two core components: the Divergent Reasoning Path Generation Module and the Reasoning Path Aggregation Module. In the first module, DivReason introduces a training-free form of controlled uncertainty to promote diverse reasoning, leveraging Monte Carlo Dropout and Directional Perturbation to expand exploration in the latent reasoning space. In the Reasoning Path Aggregation Module, we adaptively select a subset of high-quality reasoning paths from the entire path pool and aggregate them into a unified reasoning representation. Meanwhile, we further adopt an alternating reinforcement learning strategy to optimize the model, explicitly balancing accuracy and diversity during training. Extensive experimental results show that DivReason effectively mitigates the issue of reasoning path collapse, while improving both the accuracy and diversity of LLM-based recommendations.

Guojia An, Jie Zou, Yuhan Yang et al. · 1 citation
Book Open access Jul 2026

From Single- to Cross-Document: Benchmarking Multi-Granularity Event Analysis of Large Language Models

Event analysis is an essential and fundamental direction of information extraction, involving various event-centric tasks at different granularity of documents. While large language models (LLMs) have preliminarily achieved promising performance in part of these tasks individually, their capability in event analysis still lacks comprehensive understanding due to restricted document granularity, task designs, and data source of existing benchmarks. To address these limitations, we introduce MiGUE-Bench, a systematic benchmark for assessing the performance of LLMs in multi-granularity event analysis. To support large-scale evaluation, we first develop an LLM-driven self-correcting annotation framework called MiGUE-Pipeline, enabling scalable acquisition of high-quality source data of events with automatic labels. Then, we design four core tasks in our benchmark, i.e., event detection, relation reasoning, structure induction, and future prediction, to probe model competence at different levels, from atomic event details to complex cross-document narratives. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods delineate the current capability boundary and identify critical deficiencies, providing insights into the the future improvement of LLMs in challenging event analysis tasks.

Tao Wen, Shuai Shao, Pei Ke et al. · 0 citations