Neural PDE solver auto-design is fundamentally a search-space representation problem. In the space of unrestricted Python programs, valid solvers form an extremely sparse subset: most candidate programs are syntactically incorrect, semantically incompatible, or numerically unstable. Direct code generation therefore forces an LLM to spend most of its search capacity navigating implementation failures rather than reasoning about solver quality. ADSL-PDE addresses this challenge by introducing a structured search state between solver concepts and executable code. It represents the functional decisions that determine a neural PDE solver (architecture, physical constraints, objectives, sampling, and optimization) while abstracting away low-level implementation details. A deterministic compiler maps each valid search state to an executable solver. In effect, ADSL-PDE reshapes the search space: it removes large regions of invalid programs, increases the density of meaningful candidates, and preserves the compositional freedom needed to discover previously unseen designs. Solver evolution can thus operate over design decisions rather than code artifacts. Built on this representation, our evolutionary agent iteratively proposes, evaluates, and refines solver search states using empirical feedback. Across multiple PDE benchmarks, ADSL-PDE improves both search efficiency and optimization stability, achieving an improvement of more than 52% within the first ten evolution iterations. These results suggest a broader principle for LLM-driven auto-design: effective agents do not merely require stronger reasoning, but rather a search representation that concentrates exploration on valid and consequential decisions.
Large language models (LLMs) enable neural architecture search (NAS) directly over executable neural network programs. However, code-level flexibility does not provide the architecture state needed for effective mutation: LLMs must infer tensor dependencies, editable components, and compatibility constraints from implementation details. To address this representation mismatch, we propose GraphIR, an architecture-aware intermediate representation that supplements executable programs with a mutation-aligned candidate state. GraphIR organizes each candidate through three complementary views: a computation skeleton describing tensor flow, a mutation surface exposing editable modules and operations, and a validity envelope capturing interface contracts, propagated shapes, and downstream dependencies. To evaluate our method, we construct NAS-Dependency, a 120-question benchmark covering six complementary dependency-reasoning dimensions. The diagnostic shows that GraphIR is particularly effective at identifying exact producer occurrences, tracing dependency propagation, and diagnosing interface and failure risks. Across six downstream benchmarks including CLRS, GraphIR achieves the best overall search performance while maintaining comparable model size and favorable end-to-end NAS efficiency when integrated into OpenEvolve. These results show that a mutation-oriented architecture state provides an effective interface between executable neural programs and LLM-guided architecture evolution.
Zhen Liu, Wanqi Zhou, Shuanghao Bai et al.· 1 citation
This paper argues that the key lies in designing an appropriate search-state representation that connects the internal knowledge of LLMs with the structural requirements and constraints of visual-token pruning, and proposes AutoPrune, a training-free framework for LLM-driven visual-token pruning policy design.
Zhen Liu, Wenli Huang, Wei Song et al.· 0 citations
HELP, a program optimizer that prompts an LLM to generate diverse, non-overlapping atomic edits and then systematically selects and composes them into coherent program improvements using evaluator scores, is introduced.
Jingwen Fu, Zhen Liu, Yuhan Liu et al.· 2 citations
