ABSTRACT Introduction: Rotator cuff tendinopathy is a common cause of shoulder pain and disability, and the optimal nonoperative strategy remains debated. Physiotherapy is the mainstay of initial management, whereas hyaluronic acid injection has been proposed as an alternative or adjunct; their comparative effectiveness is uncertain. Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Regional Portal of the Virtual Health Library (BVS) up to February 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing hyaluronic acid injection with physiotherapy in adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy were included. Outcomes were pain, function, range of motion, and quality of life. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Results: Two randomized controlled trials (130 participants) met the eligibility criteria. Hyaluronic acid injection was associated with greater short-term improvement in pain, range of motion, and quality of life than physiotherapy, particularly within the first three months. Functional outcomes were inconsistent: one trial reported comparable improvement between groups, whereas the other favored hyaluronic acid. Certainty of evidence was very low because of small sample sizes, risk of bias, and imprecision. Conclusion: Very low-quality evidence suggests that hyaluronic acid injection may provide superior short-term benefits over physiotherapy for rotator cuff tendinopathy, mainly up to three months. The available evidence remains limited and at high risk of bias; further high-quality studies are required. Level of evidence II; Systematic review.
M. Fernandes, Leonardo Zanesco, J. Murachovsky et al.· Acta Ortopédica Brasileira· 0 citations
Introduction
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) has long been indicated for the treatment of degenerative joint diseases in patients with an intact rotator cuff. However, age-related rotator cuff degeneration may negatively impact outcomes. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), initially indicated for cuff tear arthropathy, has progressively expanded its indications, including elderly patients with an intact rotator cuff.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library databases up to November 2025, with the aim of comparing ATSA and RTSA regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, and the need for reoperation in patients aged 70 years or older with primary shoulder osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff.
Results
Only one systematic review met the inclusion criteria, encompassing four observational studies, with a total of 2.731 arthroplasties. RTSA showed a lower reoperation rate compared with ATSA. Functional outcomes favored ATSA, although based on limited data. No statistically significant differences were observed between the techniques regarding complication rates. The overall quality of evidence was classified as very low.
Conclusions
In patients aged 70 years or older with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff, RTSA is associated with a lower revision rate, whereas ATSA demonstrates superior functional outcomes, with similar complication rates between the two techniques. Level of evidence II; Systematic review.
M. Fernandes, Leonardo Zanesco, J. Murachovsky et al.· Acta Ortopédica Brasileira· 0 citations