Skip to content

Author

Johannes Oldenburg

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

In vivo and ex vivo impact of THBD and PROCR polymorphisms on the anticoagulant response of the protein C pathway.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is multifactorial, and established hereditary risk factors explain only part of heritable risk. The protein C (PC) pathway is central to anticoagulant control, and common variants in thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor genes (THBD, PROCR) have been proposed as modulators. In 73 participants, we used standardized in vivo coagulation activation with recombinant activated factor VII (15 µg/kg) and measured thrombin markers and activated protein C (APC) over 8 hours. Endothelial colony-forming cell-based ex vivo experiments were performed in 43 participants. In vivo, the APC area-under-the-curve (AUC)/thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) AUC ratio, reflecting the endogenous anticoagulant response relative to thrombin generation, provided the best model fit (adjusted R2=0.345). The APC response was lower in individuals with previous VTE (median 0.13 vs. 0.26; P=.009) and PROCR 655A>G carriers (0.11 vs. 0.26; P=.014), but higher in factor V Leiden (FVL) carriers (0.32 vs. 0.14; P=4.3×10-4) and THBD 1418C>T carriers (0.38 vs. 0.13; P=.032). The THBD 1418C>T effect was driven by reduced TAT AUC (30.6 vs. 82.7 pmol×h/L; P=.032), while the PROCR 655A>G effect reflected a lower APC AUC (8.6 vs. 10.7 pmol×h/L; P=0.04998). Ex vivo, the APC AUC/thrombin AUC ratio was lower with previous VTE and PROCR 655A>G, higher with FVL, and not associated with THBD 1418C>T. No in vivo or ex vivo association was observed for PROCR 4678C>G. This study provides in vivo evidence that common THBD and PROCR variants modulate PC pathway function, establishing the APC response as a sensitive endpoint for subtle genetic effects beyond FVL.

S. Reda, N. Schwarz, Sebastian Eckert et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-enabled discovery and biochemical optimization of minibinders targeting cancer cell-surface proteins

Experimental validation and functional optimization remain bottlenecks in AI-based protein design. We present a scalable workflow for developing AI-designed minibinders against cancer-associated surface proteins. Screening thousands of designs using mammalian cell-surface display identifies several high-affinity PD-L1 minibinders but far fewer for CD276 (B7-H3) and VTCN1 (B7-H4), highlighting substantial target dependence. Interface predicted template modeling (ipTM) scores generated by Chai-1 with ESM embeddings correlate with binding success and capture deleterious effects of interface mutations. Fluorophore-labeled AI-minibinders enable flow-cytometric staining comparable to conventional antibodies. However, when incorporated into chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), some show poor cell-surface trafficking and limited functionality. Redesign through a genetic algorithm-based diversification strategy that preserves the binding interface while changing non-binding surfaces experimentally reveals an isoelectric point (pI) window that improves CAR expression and enhances target-selective tumor cell killing. Our findings identify biochemical optimization beyond the binding interface as a critical requirement for translating AI-minibinders into functional applications. In this work the authors present a scalable mammalian cell-display workflow to identify AI-designed minibinders against cancer surface targets. AI-guided optimization beyond the binding interface improves their expression as chimeric antigen receptors and target-selective killing.

B. Broske, B. McEnroe, S. C. Frechen et al. · 0 citations