Driver distraction from in-vehicle information systems contributes significantly to road accidents. As physical controls (buttons and dials) are increasingly replaced by touchscreens and touchpads, understanding how different input modalities affect driver distraction and performance becomes critical. This study examin...
A. Omoniyi, Missie Smith, Malek Jaber et al.· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
Effective human–automation interaction requires alignment between driver mental models and system control logic. In driver assistance systems, this alignment is shaped by architecture: how functions are bundled and states are communicated. This study examined how three ADAS architectures influence driver understanding...
Duha Alkurdi, Jesudara Omidokun, John K. Lenneman et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly combine longitudinal and lateral functions, complicating drivers’ understanding of which assistance is active, limited, or requesting intervention. This paper translates findings from a naturalistic on-road study of first-time interaction with a new ADAS interface...
Sai Dheeraj Koundinya Chunduru, Ramkumaar Ekambaram Thondaiman, Manohar J. Achar et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
Touchscreens have become widely adopted in vehicles because they are flexible interfaces that enable easy updates and accommodate advancing technology. However, in-vehicle touchscreens may have detrimental effects on driver attention. As a result, incorporating some number of physical controls into in-vehicle interfac...
A. Omoniyi, Missie Smith, John K. Lenneman· IISE Annual Conference &...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
