Abstract This article proposes a reflection on the notion of archives in the work of Michel Foucault, highlighting two complementary movements in its conceptual formulation. On the one hand, archives appear as a monument, the result of an archaeological gesture that destabilizes the linearity of history and interrogates regimes of knowledge through the conditions of emergence of discourse. In this sense, discontinuity, rarity, and the materiality of what is said are foregrounded as elements that challenge totalizing narratives and promote attentive listening to the forces that traverse and sustain knowledge. On the other hand, the poetic dimension of archives is emphasized, understood as an investigative operation driven by astonishment, curiosity, and openness to chance, an effect of the dust of time and of what is found in the interstices of documents. This perspective suggests attentive listening to deviations, traces, and to what escapes, resists, and insists on remaining. Finally, the idea of “prying,” as evoked by Foucault, is outlined as a possible methodological gesture for research in education, especially in the face of the recurrence of ready-made questions and answers and the urgency of interrogating the ways in which knowledge is produced, legitimized, and circulated. This is perhaps less a conclusion than a wager still in the making: to be struck by the dust of archives and their traces of lives, marks of time, and spaces of suspension, as a way of opening breaches in the hurried logic of the present.
ABSTRACT: This article aims to analyze, from a Foucauldian perspective, the discourses present in the educational field concerning art, specifically in the interrelationship between art and teacher education. A total of 55 prominent educational journals from the last 24 years (1996-2019) were examined around the theme of the meeting of art and education. Taken as the object of an analysis anchored in the notion of archive proposed by Michel Foucault throughout his work, the discourses present in the analyzed articles point to several serializations, rarefactions and discontinuities that, among other topics, show us how the assumption of a kind of formative gift of art in teacher training seems to operate, whether for art teachers or in other areas. There is a series of statements and watchwords that seek to legitimize and reiterate attributes that derive from art as a beneficial effect in itself, consubstantiating in a kind of proselytism of the artistic-pedagogical type urged, especially, by the discourses around teacher training.