Skip to content

Author

Karen H. L. Tso

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

AI Safety Guard: Design, Prototype Implementation, and Validation Roadmap for a Privacy-Preserving Multi-Sensory Edge-AI Driver Drowsiness System

Driver drowsiness is a persistent road -safety problem whose episodic and under -reported nature complicates both prevention and measurement. This paper presents AI Safety Guard, a low -cost edge- AI prototype that combines non -contact facial-landmark analysis with bounded auditory and optional olfactory alerts. The proposed artefact uses local camera processing to estimate sustained eye closure, mouth opening and yawn patterns, and head -pose deviation; temporal decision fusion then triggers an active warning through a speaker or buzzer and, when enabled, a short, atomised scent pulse. Unlike cloud-dependent monitoring, the prototype is designed to retain no video and to record only minimal local event information. The study adopts a design -science and safety -by-design methodology: it reconstructs system requirements, specifies the hardware and inference architecture, formalises the tri- channel decision logic, and evaluates the credibility and limits of preliminary prototype evidence. Project documentation reports operation on Raspberry Pi-class hardware at approximately 10-15 frames per second, local event logging, hard -coded ac tuator duration, cooldown lockout, manual acknowledgement, and a scent opt-out. A website event trace reports 116 ms from a detection event to alert activation, whereas a separate pitch document claims 0.001 s actuation latency; this discrepancy is treated as an unresolved measurement issue rather than evidence of validated performance. The paper therefore distinguishes artefact feasibility from safety efficacy. It proposes a five -phase validation programme covering bench metrology, public -dataset evaluation, simulator experiments, closed -track trials, and regulatory readiness against functional-safety, safety-of-the-intended-functionality, privacy, and human -machine-interface requirements. The principal con tribution is an evidence -bounded blueprint for translating a student -developed prototype into a testable driver -monitoring system while preserving privacy and explicitly managing intervention risk. The system is not positioned as a substitute for sleep, rest, or safe pull-over behaviour, but as a supplementary warning device requiring independent validation before road deployment.

Karen H. L. Tso · 0 citations