Skip to content

Author

Lutfah Rif’ati

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

The Fundus Red Reflex Test Using a Smartphone Showed High Accuracy Compared to an Autorefractor to Detect Refractive Errors in Children

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of the fundus red reflex test using a smartphone and autorefractor to detect refractive errors in children.Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1302 eyes of 651 school-age children aged 6- 13 years with visual acuity worse than 6/9 in at least one eye, examined using the Snellen chart. Study participants were selected using purposive sampling, after which non-cycloplegic refractive measurement was performed using two instruments: a smartphone-based application (MD EyeCare) and an autorefractor. The detection of refractive errors using the online platform was compared with autorefraction as the reference standard.Results: Our study found that 46.10% of participants with abnormal red reflex had significant myopia, 41.20% had nonsignificant refractive errors, and 12.70% had significant hypermetropia. The mean difference between the smartphone-based application and the autorefractor was ≤−3.00 D (range: −2.88 to −2.63), with a sensitivity of 0.89 to 0.90 and a specificity of 0.86 to 0.87 for significant myopia, and the area under the curve was between 0.94 and 0.97. The mean difference between the smartphone-based application and the autorefractor was ≥+1.00 D (range: +0.13 to +0.38), with a sensitivity of 0.76 and a specificity of 0.97 for significant hypermetropia, and the area under the curve was between 0.88 and 0.96.Conclusion: A smartphone-based application could be used as a screening tool for refractive errors in children, especially in resource-limited settings.

Muhammad Syauqie, Lutfah Rif’ati, W. Diarsvitri et al. · 0 citations