Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices (AIeMD) promise to revolutionize healthcare, yet their safe adoption relies on effective Human-AI Interaction (HAAI) design and validation. Established usability engineering standards and guidances, including IEC 62366-1 and FDA frameworks, fail to address the novel sociotechnical risks of "black-box" systems, including automation bias and the misalignment of clinician mental models. This doctoral project directly addresses this gap, with the primary goal of developing a tailored human factor/usability engineering framework specifically for AIeMD. The project aims to establish robust methodologies for evaluating transparency and trust, integrating human factors and clinical performance into a multidimensional validation pipeline. Ultimately, this work will provide the evaluative tools necessary to move from subjective satisfaction to safety-critical, risk-based validation, ensuring that AI-enabled health solutions are clinically reliable, transparent, and compliant
Mariana de Oliveira· Information Hiding· 0 citations
This position paper presents a manifesto for a longitudinal, three-fold methodological pivot in health human-AI interaction, and proposes moving beyond static satisfaction metrics towards relational metrics —Longitudinal Trust Calibration, Automation Bias Drift, and Error Recovery Velocity—that track the maturity and resilience of the human-AI partnership.
Mariana de Oliveira, Célia F. Cruz, Nuno Matela· Information Hiding· 0 citations