The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as the standard layer connecting Large Language Model agents to external tool backends. This openness introduces a severe server-side threat we term TrustShift: a compromised MCP server behaves benignly during an initial conditioning phase, building operational reliance and suppressing agent skepticism, before switching to an adversarial payload once an interaction threshold is reached. The evasion is temporal, not syntactic: benign at deploy time, the server's defection is invisible to predeployment static analysis, which sees only the honest phase. Switched payloads range from overt structural violations to schema-valid manipulations, the latter preserving outer protocol compliance to evade runtime middleware filters. Crucially, TrustShift originates in the server-controlled tool channel, not user prompts (unlike indirect prompt injection) or the transport (unlike man-in-the-middle): the adversary is the trusted server endpoint itself. We introduce TrustShiftProbe, an evaluation and defense framework with four contributions: (1) a stateful temporal threat model of the agent-server lifecycle as a benign conditioning phase followed by an adversarial defection at a trust horizon; (2) a language-agnostic attack engine that instantiates each variant as a compromised MCP server across four production domains; (3) SHIELD, a multi-tier, zero-oracle runtime defense at the MCP transport boundary that audits server payloads against behavioral baselines learned during clean trust windows; and (4) a taxonomy of nine TrustShift variants spanning three execution mechanisms (structural violation, semantic corruption, scope expansion) and three adversarial objectives (disruption, exfiltration, and their combination). Across frontier proprietary and open-weight models, TrustShift attacks achieve a 69.5% mean attack success rate that SHIELD mitigates to 42.7%.
Mehrdad Rostamzadeh, Sidhant Narula, Mohammad Ghasemigol et al.· 0 citations
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) are a promising framework for quantum machine learning on near-term quantum devices, but their security risks remain insufficiently understood. Studies have shown that QNNs are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, yet existing quantum backdoors mostly rely on a fixed trigger shared by all poisoned inputs. This fixed-trigger design is a major weakness because many defenses detect or weaken the repeated patterns such triggers leave in data representations. Although input-aware dynamic backdoors have been studied in classical neural networks, transferring them to QNNs is difficult because quantum learning introduces new obstacles. In particular, measurement compresses the post-ansatz quantum state into a limited classical output, weakening supervision for a trigger generator, while individual density matrices fluctuate with the input and make per-sample contrastive learning unstable. To address these challenges, we propose Q-DIBA, the first input-aware dynamic backdoor attack for QNNs. Q-DIBA jointly trains a classical trigger generator and a victim QNN through a three-mode mini-batch strategy that supports clean behavior, attack activation, and trigger specificity. To provide stable quantum-level supervision, Q-DIBA introduces an ensemble density contrastive loss that operates on post-ansatz quantum states before measurement and contrasts mode-averaged density matrices rather than individual samples. Experiments on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST across multiple QNN architectures show that Q-DIBA achieves high clean accuracy, strong attack success, and high cross-trigger accuracy, demonstrating effectiveness, stealthiness, and input specificity. The attack also remains resilient against defenses including visual inspection, spectral-signature detection, and fine-tuning, suggesting that input-aware quantum backdoors are an important threat to secure QNN deployment.
Junrui Zhang, Zemin Chen, Lusi Li et al.· 0 citations