Writing skill is a crucial skill for students in tertiary level education. For students who do not possess good writing skills, they might be intimidated by writing tasks and assignments. This low self-efficacy might hinder them from performing in a writing task. Hence, this study aims to investigate the relationship between students’ self-efficacy and the writing strategies (metacognitive, effort regulation, cognitive, society, and affective strategies) that they use. A quantitative approach was employed, specifically the survey research design to determine the relationship between these two variables. A total of 147 university students from a public university in Selangor, Malaysia were involved in this study, who responded to a questionnaire distributed through online platforms. In general, the findings of this study found that generally students had high self-efficacy, and they employed various strategies in order to complete their writing tasks. The implication of this study is that while teaching writing strategies to students is helpful, students’ confidence and self-efficacy should also be raised in the teaching and learning process.
Hidayu Shafie, Izlin Mohamad Ghazali, Nurul Nadiah Dewi Faizul Ganapathy et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, has transformed academic writing in higher education by supporting idea generation, drafting, revision, and language improvement. However, limited research has examined learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT across different stages of the writing process. Therefore, this study investigated learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT use, their perceptions of the planning, translating, and reviewing stages of writing, and the relationship between ChatGPT and these stages. This quantitative survey study involved 186 tertiary students selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a 43-item five-point Likert scale questionnaire adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017) and Youssef et al. (2024), comprising three sections: demographic profile, writing process, and ChatGPT. The findings revealed that learners generally perceived ChatGPT positively and reported positive perceptions towards all three writing stages. Correlation analysis showed a moderate significant positive relationship between ChatGPT and planning, as well as weak significant positive relationships between ChatGPT and translating and reviewing. The findings suggest that ChatGPT functions as a complementary tool that supports learners throughout the writing process while preserving the importance of cognitive and strategic writing behaviours. The study provides insights for the effective and responsible integration of ChatGPT in higher education writing instruction.
Izlin Mohamad Ghazali, Hidayu Shafie, Nurul Nadiah Dewi Faizul Ganapathy et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations