Human social communication, such as affection and intent, is often conveyed in highly implicit ways, where underlying meanings are expressed through indirect, socially and culturally grounded signals rather than explicit statements. Such implicit social contexts are pervasive in real-world interactions, yet there remains a lack of a formal and systematic framework for studying them. In this paper, we introduce Implicit Social Context Analysis (MoCA), a novel task that systematically models implicit social scenarios along three key dimensions: affection, intent, and stance. We construct a high-quality benchmark containing 3,108 multimodal instances collected from real-world sources, with fine-grained cognitive annotations revealing who expresses what toward whom, as well as how and why it is conveyed. Using the MoCA dataset, we show that state-of-the-art multimodal large language models struggle significantly with this task because of their reliance on explicit cues and limited ability to reason over latent social contexts. To address this challenge, we propose Conflict-Driven Abductive Reasoning (CoDAR), a novel framework that models the discrepancy between observed expressions and expected truthful behavior as cognitive conflict, thereby enabling the inference of hidden mental states. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoDAR substantially improves model performance. Nevertheless, a large gap from human reasoning remains, highlighting the fundamental difficulty of implicit social understanding.
Wenhao Xu, Kaiwen Zhang, Hao Li et al.· 0 citations
Recent advances in foundation models have enabled AI scientists to automate increasingly complete research workflows, from hypothesis generation and code execution to manuscript preparation. Yet workflow coverage alone does not provide access to the full evidence on which scientific discovery depends. Existing systems typically reason over text, code, labels, or precomputed summaries, leaving scientifically decisive spatial, temporal, cross-channel, and procedural relations unavailable to the agent. We introduce OmniScientist, an end-to-end, omni-modal AI scientist that conducts multidisciplinary research directly from heterogeneous raw evidence. A perception layer and 3 autonomous agents for ideation, experiment, and writeup operate within a deterministic pipeline, allowing observations to shape research questions, experimental decisions, and final claims throughout the research lifecycle. By running idea, rigour, and claim checks in code, the system enforces novelty screening, statistical validity, execution provenance, and numerical traceability. We evaluate OmniScientist on 36 real-data cases spanning 5 discipline families, 4 families of scientific evidence, and modalities including images, signals, audio, video, 3-D structures, trajectories, tables, formulae, and graphs. The system completes the full path from raw data to a compiled manuscript in all 36 cases and achieves a mean overall paper score of 6.3 with the reference reasoning backbone. In paired comparisons against a blind variant that receives only precomputed scalar features, direct perception improves all 7 evaluation dimensions and wins 85% of head-to-head judgments. These results show that lifecycle-wide perception is essential for evidence-grounded scientific discovery and provides a practical path toward broadly capable AI scientists.
Automated fact-checking aims to verify the veracity of claims based on related evidence, and has become increasingly important as large language models (LLMs) make it easier to generate and disseminate misinformation at scale. In open settings, effective fact-checking requires models to iteratively retrieve relevant evidence and reason over noisy and incomplete information. While recent LLM-based approaches have shown promising reasoning capabilities, prompt-based methods remain limited by the inherent behaviors of base LLMs, and supervised fine-tuning methods typically require costly annotated reasoning trajectories. In this paper, we propose R3Check, a rule-guided reinforcement learning framework that enables LLMs to perform iterative retrieval–reasoning for multi-hop fact-checking. R3Check formulates the retriever as an external environment and optimizes the model using Group Relative Policy Optimization, relying only on final veracity labels and format-based rewards rather than explicit reasoning annotations. To mitigate the mutual interference between retrieval and reasoning that arises under joint training, we introduce a two-stage curriculum that first trains structured reasoning under closed fact-checking with gold evidence, and then jointly optimizes retrieval and reasoning with real-time retrieval. An importance-based sampling strategy further strengthens effective supervision signals during training. Despite using only a 7B backbone, R3Check outperforms existing baselines and even powerful reasoning LLMs, under both given-evidence and real-time retrieval settings, while producing interpretable reasoning chains. This work demonstrates the potential of pure reinforcement learning to induce effective retrieval–reasoning behaviors for fact-checking under weak supervision.
Peng Qi, Yuyang Zhao, W. Hsu et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
This paper proposes UrbanGround, the first sandbox to make this question testable in a physically constrained replica of Hong Kong built from territory-wide 3D geospatial data, and hopes it will support broader study of how far current MLLM agents can explore reliably in complex, open-ended urban environments.
Tianjie Ju, Zheng Wu, Yueqing Sun et al.· 0 citations
IBA-Bench is introduced, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories that contain noise, implicit cues, and temporal inconsistencies, and the proposed IBA-Agent is proposed, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
Jiajia Song, Bobo Li, Haiwen Yi et al.· 0 citations