We have 3 of 10 papers
We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
It is argued that compile rate is a scientifically unreliable metric for single-function vulnerability repair, and this is supported with five controlled experiments over 203 vulnerable functions from Big-Vul, three open-source code LLMs (350M to 6.7B parameters), and three prompting strategies.
A Au-diting black-box (behavioral) detection of un-faithful CoT against FaithCoT-Bench’s human annotations, and independently verify and resolve a documentation–data mismatch in the bench-mark’s label semantics.
Auditing black-box (behavioral) detection of unfaithful CoT against FaithCoT-Bench's human annotations, the authors find answer correctness structures the problem at every level.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
