Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) turns agent experience into learning signals primarily through scalar outcome rewards after interaction. For group-relative objectives, however, this signal vanishes when all rollouts receive the same reward, even though their trajectories may reveal useful informat...
Haoxiang Zhang, Qing-Lin Chen, Hiroaki Hayashi et al.· 1 citation
Open-ended discovery requires learning from repeated attempts while continuing to explore directions whose value is not yet apparent. Search with a frozen large language model (LLM) can reuse previous solutions in context, but cannot update the model from its successes and failures on the test problem. Reinforcement le...
Tao Feng, Fangxu Yu, Zi-Jie Lei et al.· 0 citations
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of acting in complex tool-use environments, yet they often fail to recognize when tasks are infeasible and no valid solution exists. Recent work has formalized this reliability gap as the problem of agentic abstention, and existing approaches typically optimize...
Hang Luo, Bing-Bing Wen, Guang Yang et al.· 0 citations
A dense, decision-level reward is introduced in which an LLM judge evaluates the necessity of each tool call, which effectively suppresses cue-driven tool use while preserving task performance, providing a practical approach to improving the robustness of LLM agent tool-use policies.
Yi-Wei Yang, Hao-Xiang Zhang, Bing-Bing Wen et al.· 0 citations
DeepDebug achieves the best strict attribution accuracy among the evaluated methods on both tested open-weight backbones, reaching 28.8 percent exact agent-and-step accuracy on qwen3.5-9b versus 21.7 percent for the strongest single-pass baseline.
Kunlun Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Zhi-Guang Han et al.· arXiv.org· 3 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.