Skip to content

Author

Quim Motger

We have 5 of 35 papers

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Sep 2026

Supercharge Your Requirements With Generative AI: Has the Best Come Yet?

For this first guest editorial, we get an update from a Requirements Engineering Workshop discussing how AI will impact the future of their field.

Quim Motger, Jacek Dąbrowski, Farnaz Fotrousi et al. · 0 citations

Fine-Grained Emotion Classification from Mobile App Reviews: An Empirical Study with Large Language Models

Context: Fine-grained emotion classification of mobile app reviews enables requirements engineering activities that go beyond polarity-based opinion mining, including emotionally informed issue prioritisation and feature-oriented feedback analysis. However, automatic fine-grained emotion extraction from app reviews rem...

Quim Motger, Carlota Catot, M. Oriol · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Predicting LLM Performance from Prompt Linguistic Features: An Empirical Study in Requirements Engineering

Whether measurable linguistic properties of prompts can predict LLM performance before inference is investigated, enabling low-cost prompt selection and refinement, validated on binary requirements classification targeting F1, F2, precision, and recall.

Quim Motger, Alessio Miaschi, Xavier Franch et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Preprint Sep 2026

From Prompting to Engineering: A Research Agenda for Prompt Engineering in Software Engineering

A structured community discussion at the First International Workshop on Empirical Prompt Engineering for Software Engineering (PROMPT-SE) discussed current prompting practices, challenges to their adoption and evaluation, and future directions for integrating prompt engineering into software development.

Vincenzo De Martino, Giovanna Broccia, Fabiano Pecorelli et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges

This work presents a systematic literature review characterizing 141 primary studies on Multi-Agent Debate, and derives a three-dimensional taxonomy covering debate participants, the interaction mechanisms structuring the exchange, and the agreement protocols governing debate resolution, supported by formal notations t...

Quim Motger, M. Oriol, J. Marco et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.