Skip to content

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

A Comparative Study of Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in PNS Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Background: Regional anesthesia, particularly ‘ the supraclavicular brachial plexus block, is widely used for upper limb surgeries due to its rapid onset, dense blockade, and superior postoperative analgesia. The addition of α2- adrenergic agonists as adjuvants to local anesthetics can enhance block characteristics. Aim: To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in PNS-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methodology: This prospective comparative observational study was conducted on 80 ASA I–II patients undergoing elective upper limb surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: RC (ropivacaine with clonidine 1 μg/kg) and RD (ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg). Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, duration of analgesia, and hemodynamic parameters were assessed and analyzed using SPSS v24, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant. Results: The RD group showed a significantly faster onset of sensory (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 10.65 ± 1.14 min) and motor block (10.23 ± 1.12 vs. 14.8 ± 1.29 min) and prolonged sensory (752.5 ± 5.9 vs. 470.25 ± 29.39 min), motor (513.75 ± 20.34 vs. 274.75 ± 28.19 min), and analgesia duration (765.82 ± 104.48 vs. 464.27 ± 66.2 min) than RC (p < 0.001). Hemodynamics remained stable in both groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a superior adjuvant to ropivacaine compared to clonidine, providing faster onset, longer block duration, and extended analgesia without significant adverse effects.

R. Singh, Sushmita Das, Chandrani Dutta Biswas et al. · 0 citations