Skip to content

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires deep sedation to ensure immobility and optimal image quality. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is effective but may cause airway depression and hemodynamic instability at higher doses. Dexmedetomidine has minimal respiratory effects but may prolong sedation. This study evaluated whether a low-dose dexmedetomidine bolus combined with propofol shortens recovery time (primary outcome); improves hemodynamic stability; reduces airway events, induction time, and total propofol dose; and minimizes scan interruptions (secondary outcomes). In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, children undergoing MRI were assigned to two groups. Group D+P received 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine over 2–3 minutes plus a 1 mg/kg bolus of propofol followed by infusion; Group P received propofol alone as bolus and infusion. Propofol infusion rate was adjusted to achieve a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 5–6. Recovery time was analyzed using t test; scan interruptions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Group D+P had a shorter recovery time (19.4 ± 35 vs. 31.4 ± 36.1 min; P = 0.042) and faster induction (128.9 vs. 224.6 sec; P < 0.001). The propofol infusion rate was lower in Group D + P than in Group P (76.3 ± 65.6 vs 123 ± 45.5 μg/kg/min; P < 0.001). Additional boluses were more frequent in Group P ( P = 0.003). Bradycardia occurred in significantly more children in Group D + P than in Group P ( P = 0.008). Low-dose dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to propofol for pediatric MRI sedation reduces recovery time, propofol requirement, and airway-related complications, while enabling faster induction and fewer scan interruptions with increased risk of bradycardia.

Kishorkumar Dhanaboopathy, E. Rai, Aparna Williams et al. · 0 citations