Patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly following allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHCT), have extremely limited therapeutic options. CD123 is an AML-associated antigen and represents an attractive target for immunotherapy. We report outcomes of a phase 1 trial evaluating CD123-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML or blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN). This was a single center, open-label, phase 1 dose escalation study enrolling patients with either CD123-positive r/r AML (Arm 1) or BPDCN (Arm 2). Patients received autologous or donor-derived allogeneic CD123 CAR T cells following lymphodepletion. The co-primary objectives were to examine safety and anti-tumor activity using an activity-constrained for toxicity design and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives included assessments of progression-free and overall survival. We enrolled 41 patients, of whom 21 patients (n = 19 on Arm 1 and n = 2 on Arm 2) received CD123 CAR T-cell infusion. The median age of treated AML patients was 45 years (range: 20–71); the two BPDCN patients were aged 24 and 75 years. Among AML patients, 17 (89%) had undergone prior alloHCT. AML patients received 50 × 106 (n = 2), 200 × 106 (n = 6), or 500 × 106 (n = 11) CAR T cells; BPDCN patients received 100 × 106 CAR T cells. There was no dose-limiting toxicity, prolonged myelosuppression, or graft-versus-host disease. Fourteen (74%) AML patients developed grade ≤ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 11 (58%) experienced grade ≤ 2 neurotoxicity. Fifteen of 19 treated AML patients were evaluable for disease response for overall best response, of whom 4 (26.7%) had best response of complete remission, including 2 with incomplete count recovery. Neither patient with BPDCN developed CRS but both experienced grade 1 neurotoxicity. One of 2 BPDCN patients achieved CR and relapsed at 3 months. CAR T cell expansion was dose-dependent, but persistence was limited. CD123-directed CAR T-cell therapy is feasible and demonstrates a favorable safety profile in patients with r/r AML and BPDCN, including those with prior alloHCT. Although the estimated overall complete remission rate was modest, these findings provide a foundation for further optimization of CD123 CAR T-cell design, patient selection, and combination strategies. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02159495.
L. Budde, M. D. Del Real, J. Song et al.· Journal of Hematology & Onco...· 0 citations
CD19-directed therapy remains the mainstay treatment for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, treatment patterns and outcomes following CD19-negative (CD19-) relapse remain poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed 65 adult patients with ALL who developed CD19-relapse after CD19-directed therapy. TP53 mutations and BCR::ABL1-like ALL were each identified in 27.7% (n = 18) of patients. Forty-six patients (70.8%) received one CD19-targeted therapy, whereas 19 patients (29.2%) received ≥ 2 prior to CD19-relapse. Overall, 60 patients (92.3%) received blinatumomab, and 23 (35.4%) received CAR T-cell therapy. The median time from the initiation of the most recent CD19-targeted therapy to CD19-relapse was 155 days (range, 13-1946). The median follow-up of the entire cohort was 32.7 months (IQR, 15.1-90.3). The median event-free and overall survival (EFS and OS) was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-4.5) and 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.8-24.7), respectively. In multivariate analysis, receipt of ≥ 2 CD19-directed therapies was associated with both inferior EFS and OS, HR 2.17 (95% CI, 1.10-4.29; p = 0.03) and HR 3.05 (95% CI, 1.40-6.62; p = 0.005). The complete remission rate following first salvage therapy was 47.5% and 72.1% any time following CD19-relapse. Sixteen (34.8%) of 46 patients evaluated had subsequent CD19 re-expression, 5 of whom subsequently received CD19-directed therapy, and all 5 patients responded. Patients with ALL who develop CD19-relapse after CD19-directed therapy have poor outcomes and limited therapeutic options. However, since this study lacked a comparator cohort of patients with CD19-positive relapse, the independent prognostic impact of CD19 negativity could not be determined.
T. Othman, Vaibhav Agrawal, Joo Y. Song et al.· American journal of hematolo...· 0 citations