Existing event-based optical flow approaches often build on frame-based counterparts, failing to deliver high-frequency flow estimation. Methods that specifically address this issue fail to achieve comparable performance or the desired computational efficiency. In this work, we introduce a novel temporal iterative refinement (TIR) framework to obtain low-latency flow updates at high frequency. The TIR module incorporates the previous flow estimate along with the updated feature maps to simultaneously update and refine the flow estimate at each time step, thereby predicting accurate nonlinear pixel trajectories. However, updating the feature space at high frequency with conventional CNNs may lead to the temporal aperture problem, as the small temporal receptive field may not be enough to capture the necessary spatial context. We introduce SNN-based feature encoders to efficiently address this problem. The temporal dynamics of the SNNs provide an increased temporal receptive field, while their deployment on neuromorphic hardware offers a promising path toward additional energy efficiency. The results obtained on the real-world MVSEC dataset show that our network achieves 17× and 33× lower computations than the state-of-the-art E-RAFT and TMA, respectively, while maintaining similar accuracy performance. Compared to other supervised learning-based approaches, our network exhibits better cross-domain generalization, hinting toward the strong inductive biases of the network. To demonstrate the remarkable potential of our approach, we also provide results in extremely challenging scenarios with highly nonlinear pixel trajectories from the MultiFlow dataset, which also features high-frequency ground truth. Our code will be available at https://github.com/AhmedHumais/STIRFlow.
M. Humais, Hussain M. Sajwani, Sajid Javed et al.· IEEE Transactions on Image P...· 0 citations
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly answer questions whose correctness depends on visual, textual, temporal, acoustic, document, chart, or embodied evidence. Their failures are therefore not only linguistic. A fluent answer may conceal poor input quality, a perceptual error, weak grounding, conflict between modalities, unstable reasoning, distribution shift, or a question that is not answerable from the supplied evidence. This survey organizes the literature on uncertainty-aware MLLMs around a decision-centered framework: uncertainty sources give rise to observable signals, signals must be calibrated or controlled for risk, and calibrated uncertainty should determine the system action. We review work on token and logit uncertainty, semantic disagreement, perturbation instability, grounding and attribution scores, verbalized confidence, verifier and judge scores, conformal prediction, selective answering, abstention, clarification, retrieval, self-checking, and escalation. The central argument is that uncertainty should not be evaluated only as a confidence number; it should be evaluated by whether it improves behavior under insufficient, conflicting, shifted, or high-risk multimodal evidence. We position this survey against text-only uncertainty and abstention surveys, broad MLLM surveys, MLLM hallucination surveys, and safety-oriented reviews. We conclude with open problems in source-aware decomposition, action-aware benchmarks, calibration under shift, black-box uncertainty estimation, broader modality coverage, reproducible reporting, and human-centered uncertainty communication.