The article examines the word-formation mechanisms and usage patterns of animal and bird names presented in the textbook
Oqu quraly
(1927), authored by A. Baitursynuly and T. Shonanuly. Based on empirical linguistic data, the study demonstrates that Kazakh intellectuals of the early twentieth century not only developed terminology for various scientific domains but also created Kazakh equivalents for animal species not native to the Kazakh steppe. The study identifies and analyzes selected lexical units, determines their word-formation models, and establishes which of them function as Kazakh equivalents of borrowed concepts. It further distinguishes between author-specific nominations and those that have entered the general lexical system of the Kazakh language. A comparative analysis is conducted between the early 20th-century coinages and their later standardized forms currently in use. Particular attention is paid to calquing as a dominant strategy in naming animal species inhabiting different continents, including America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. The findings demonstrate that the creation of animal and bird names constitutes a significant dimension of early Kazakh intellectuals’ lexical innovation and contributes to the development of national scientific terminology. It was concluded that, during this period, calquing began to be actively used in Kazakh linguistics as a method of word formation. Based on specific linguistic data drawn from the works of prominent scholars, the creation of Kazakh names for birds, wild animals, and other fauna is comprehensively analyzed as a distinctive aspect of the lexical creativity of the Kazakh intelligentsia, and the main reasons for this phenomenon are identified. It is noted that the linguists Akhmet Baitursynuly and Telzhan Shonanuly, when creating new words and terms in educational materials, as well as when translating and writing borrowed words and terms, were guided by the scientific principles approved at the 1924 Congress of Kazakh Educators.
This article investigates the semantic evolution of the lexeme qatyn in Kazakh from an originally respectful designation for a married woman to a socially marked, often pejorative label. Drawing on historical dictionaries, early Kazakh texts, Old Turkic inscriptions, and contemporary media discourse, the study combines methods of historical lexicology, etymological analysis, and sociolinguistic interpretation. The analysis systematizes competing etymologies that derive qatyn from Old Turkic qatun and from internal Turkic word-formation, and relates them to cultural models of marriage, kinship, and social hierarchy. Particular attention is paid to the role of Soviet-era language policy, purism, and ideological regulation of public discourse in shifting the evaluative profile of the word, as well as to the continuing coexistence of respectful and pejorative uses in present-day Kazakh. The paper argues that the semantic degradation of qatyn is not the result of purely internal linguistic change, but reflects broader transformations in gender ideology, urbanization, and the reconfiguration of Kazakh–Russian bilingual practices. By tracing micro-level changes in collocations, phraseology, and genre distribution, the article demonstrates how a key element of the Kazakh kinship lexicon has become a site where issues of linguistic correctness, national identity, and gendered respectability are negotiated.
Sherubay Kurmanbaiuly, M. Adilov, G. Alimbek et al.· Theory and Practice in Langu...· 0 citations