Skip to content

Author

Simon Clematide

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Open access Jul 2026

ICDAR 2026 HIPE-OCRepair Competition on LLM-Assisted OCR Post-Correction for Historical Documents

We present the results of HIPE-OCRepair-2026, an ICDAR competition on LLM-assisted OCR post-correction of historical documents. OCR post-correction remains a long-standing challenge in digital heritage: large-scale collections of digitized documents are affected by legacy OCR errors, while re-digitization at scale remains impractical. Large language models (LLMs) offers a major opportunity to revisit this challenge, yet their effectiveness across languages, document types, and noise conditions - and their tendency to hallucinate - remains insufficiently understood. HIPE-OCRepair-2026 pursues two objectives: (i) to evaluate the capabilities of modern OCR post-correction systems, and (ii) to provide a reproducible evaluation framework anchored in the HIPE-OCRepair-2026 dataset, a harmonized multilingual resource consolidating existing and newly curated historical datasets. Participants were tasked with correcting noisy OCR transcripts from historical newspapers and printed works in English, French, and German (17th-20th century), working at the level of coherent transcription units (paragraphs or articles) without access to source images. The evaluation adopts a retrieval-oriented rather than diplomatic scoring approach, reflecting the practical use case of search and access over digitized collections. Four teams submitted systems ranging from zero-shot prompting to continued pre-training and fine-tuning, offering insights into the merits of different adaptation strategies. Results show that modern LLM-assisted systems can significantly improve OCR quality, but performance varies across datasets, languages, and noise levels. Over-correction on low-noise inputs emerges as a recurring challenge, highlighting the importance of evaluation beyond character error reduction. The dataset, scorer, and evaluation pipeline are publicly released to support future research.

Maud Ehrmann, E. Boros, Juri Opitz et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Jun 2026

ALEE: Any-Language Evaluation of Embeddings via English-Centric Minimal Pairs

A large-scale empirical study across a diverse set of embedding models and 275+ languages spanning three parallel datasets, exposing persistent gaps in cross-lingual semantic representation that track language prevalence in training resources and subword tokenization.

Andrianos Michail, Stylianos Psychias, Michelle Wastl et al. · 0 citations